Jump to content

Climate Change & Global Warming


Atomic
 Share

How important is Global Warming to you in the Grand Scheme of Things?  

246 members have voted

  1. 1. How important is Global Warming to you in the Grand Scheme of Things?

    • Give me a break, I've enough on my plate
      17
    • I suppose there's something in it, but it's for the Politicians/Corporations/Those in power to sort out
      4
    • Yes I think it is important and I try to do my bit.
      79
    • If we don't stop it, the Planet dies in a few years, it's as simple as that.
      34
    • I think it is all hype and not half as bad as they make out
      108
    • I don't know what to think
      17

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Yes, but similarly, vessels and scientists from the Aberdeen Marine Laboratory were monitoring the decline in a cold current flowing from the Arctic southward that would create similar change and reduction in the Gulf Stream from over 20 years ago. The projected outcome of this earlier monitoring was the introduction of subarctic winters at these latitudes, with related ice formation and snow.

 

It would be difficult to estimate whether this would benefit or damage marine ecosystems in this area, as a net effect. It may benefit fish stocks, for one. :wink:

 

It could also bring calmer colder drier winters. :thmbsup

But that's all speculation , of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Polar bear climate scientist investigated over 'misconduct'

 

A biologist who claimed polar bears were drowning because of melting ice caps has been placed on administrative leave as officials investigate scientific misconduct allegations.

Although it wasn't clear what the exact allegations were, a government watchdog group representing Anchorage-based scientist Charles Monnett said investigators have focused on his 2006 journal article about the bears that garnered worldwide attention.

 

The group, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, filed a complaint on Mr Monnett's behalf with the agency, the US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement.

 

 

BOEMRE told Mr Monnett on July 18 that he was being put on leave, pending an investigation into "integrity issues."

 

A BOEMRE spokesman acknowledged there was an "ongoing internal investigation" but declined to get into specifics about it.

 

Mr Monnett, who has coordinated much of BOEMRE's research on Arctic wildlife and ecology, has duties that include managing about $50 million worth of studies, according to the complaint. According to documents provided by Ruch's group, which sat in on investigators interviews with Mr Monnett, the questioning focused on observations that he and fellow researcher Jeffrey Gleason made in 2004.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/8669678/Polar-bear-climate-scientist-investigated-over-misconduct.html

 

 

I can think of 50 million reasons why his integrity might be questioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Is everyone ignoring Pleepsie's post then?

 

I try to stay objective. But i have to ask, what happened to the scientists not being in it for the money? This sort of multi-million dollar funding for of climate change research is actually mentioned by a poster In that same article. It's pretty much dismissed by others. But here it is, in big round figures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure there's a lot of information to comment on yet?

What they are alleged to have done, whether they did it and what effect it might have had on the integrity of their work is still all uncertain?

 

I think though we have 80 pages worth of comments here covering most possible types of bias/prejudice/human frailty from all sides, and folk are mostly "posted-out" on the topic in general?

 

$50M is potentially not so big though - I'm not too senior at my work and still manage near $50M worth of assets.... it soon mounts up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Our site contains content that we create as well as content provided by third parties. This content includes, among other things, product reviews and services offered by parties other than PhysOrg.com. We do not guarantee the accuracy, the integrity, or the quality of the content on our sites, and you may not rely on any of this content. http://www.physorg.com/help/terms/

 

Just about says it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...