KOYAANISQATSI Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 Well I'd contest that they had 'big media smiles'http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEAySu-hTJo As for more to go on, like what specifically?We're on page 24 now, please check thread for details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnglishinScotland Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 That shows absolutely nothing IMO. So they have moments where not in 24/7 dour faced gloom. Doesn't mean they are not sad at the loss of their kid. They have their other kids to think of also. I also think it's silly for people who've never lost a kid to talk about how people 'should' be reacting, or whats' 'normal'. They should have the humility to know they can't possibly be an expert on these things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lita340 Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 no we would not know but then we can surmise is that not how some people can justify there statements about anything???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOYAANISQATSI Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 it's silly for people who've never lost a kid to talk about how people 'should' be reacting, or whats' 'normal'. Silly people who didn't lose their children while out on the lash, you surely mean. They should have the humility to know they can't possibly be an expert on these things.Yes, I admit I am no expert on finding my kids missing after coming home from a meal, when no babysitter was there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnglishinScotland Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 Silly people who didn't lose their children while out on the lash, you surely mean. Yes, I admit I am no expert on finding my kids missing after coming home from a meal, when no babysitter was there. No, I don't. What a flippant response. Why divert the issue? No, you confess you're not, so why comment on it as though you are? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOYAANISQATSI Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 No, you confess you're not, so why comment on it as though you are? The point is neither are they, this is the lame alibi they choose to use.Diverting the issue is what they practice.Either Jenny Murat is lying or something stinks bad with the Tapas posse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOYAANISQATSI Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 What a flippant response. flippant:flippant \FLIP-uhnt\, adjective:Lacking proper seriousness or respect Your not wrong there, I neither took yer statement seriously or gave it much respect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnglishinScotland Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 What a flippant response. flippant:flippant \FLIP-uhnt\, adjective:Lacking proper seriousness or respect Your not wrong there, I neither took the question seriously or gave it much respect. Oooohh, I'll ignore the bitching. It's 'you're' by the way, not to be 'flippant' or anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOYAANISQATSI Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 Oooohh, I'll ignore the bitching. It's 'you're' by the way, not to be 'flippant' or anythingThat be pedantic is dur wird your meenin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnglishinScotland Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 The point is neither are they, this is the lame alibi they choose to use.Diverting the issue is what they practice.. If it's such a lame alibi, do explain to me how they managed to kill their kid, then convince close friends they had lost her, then get rid of the body with the media spotlight they were under? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOYAANISQATSI Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 The details remain untold, but to hazzard a guess; If the whole thing wasn't a preplaned murder most horrid then it looks like an overdose of sedatives of one kind or another, by the actions and statements of the Tapas crew, there's a pretty good chance they're in on it somewhere and as I've said before here, they weren't suspects 25 days after the 3rd of may so why would a camera be on them at say 3am if they needed to nip out to clear their heads, go for a drive maybe, perhaps stop at the local church a while.They did have the key for out of hours goings on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njugle Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 It's nice to see that you admit you are merely guessing again Koy, for a while there you were stating self-constructed "facts". What was that about ad hominem responses? You are adopting them as a debating tool against those who don't wholeheartedly agree with you, like EnglishinScotland? Thanks for the preemptive guidance. I'm also surprised you missed this:http://www.newsdeskspecial.co.uk/2007/10/gerry-mccann-is.html'Gerry McCann is not Maddie’s biological father’ (latest version, paraphrased from Portuegese newspaper '24 Horas'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAStewart Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 after 161 days and 24 pages of discussion. Does anyone really care anymore? It seems like the papers (albiet the Daily Express which has changed from The Diana Express to the Madaline Express) don't give this any more attention, which is fair to be honest, nothing has come of it. I've lost interest in this story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOYAANISQATSI Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 It's nice to see that you admit you are merely guessing again Koy Only cause I was asked to special like. Rest of time I'll stick to my self-constructed "facts". What was that about ad hominem responses? You are adopting them as a debating tool against those who don't wholeheartedly agree with you, like EnglishinScotland? Yeah, exactly like that. I'm also surprised you missed this:http://www.newsdeskspecial.co.uk/2007/10/gerry-mccann-is.htmlI didn't miss it, I didn't see the relevance though."ERE" thats not another ad homineminem thingy is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njugle Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 Sorry old chap, i didn't see the relevance in the comedy south park animations and suchlike, i thought you were just posting every new development, blog or otherwise, that you found. I thought that that latest "Gerry's not the dad" reference would add to the Miss Marple case against him as a potential suspect. All the more reason to do her in?If it's true, that is, and not just another tabloid speculation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now