Baxter Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 I believe Saunders kicked an Unst player in the head, while i believe Mouat kicked out a yell player. So it may be that the 2 players deserved what they got! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay_Corolla Posted May 5, 2008 Report Share Posted May 5, 2008 Works League Mossbank 2-2 Wrultizers a note from this game, Mossbank's Michael Owers is currently in hosptial in Aberdeen after snapping both bones in his leg after a bad challenge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoichkov Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 I thought that would have been a brutal encounter, but that is terrible news. Do you know what's happening to the guy that made the challenge? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 thats really bad like. was it just one of those unfortunate accidents that can happen in football or was it something more maliscious? You would think tir would be some form of susension or ban. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brokenlink Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 not good to hear that news. I hope for all sakes that the injury was caused accidently. As for suspensions if someone was guilty of some challenge with malicious intent, I know it was in a different league but the 8 game ban handed out to Mr Saunders of Yell for a petulent wave of his boot may give an indication of what someone who actually meant to injure someone should receive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheltie1989 Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 It was an accident Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay_Corolla Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 thats really bad like. was it just one of those unfortunate accidents that can happen in football or was it something more maliscious? You would think tir would be some form of susension or ban. nah it certainly wasnt a malicous challenge. it was just a 50/50 ball which was there to be won. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neeson11 Posted May 7, 2008 Report Share Posted May 7, 2008 he is in a cast for a min of 6 weeks, for what ive heard the guy has a one match ban for what i know worm and the guy dont have any strong feeling against eachother (worms michaels nickname) CMON MOSSBANK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Posted May 7, 2008 Report Share Posted May 7, 2008 I know it was in a different league but the 8 game ban handed out to Mr Saunders of Yell for a petulent wave of his boot. A kick to the head of a player, petulant or not. Could do some serious damage! and this sort of act should not be tolerated in any form of football. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marooned in Maywick Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 thats really bad like. was it just one of those unfortunate accidents that can happen in football or was it something more maliscious? You would think tir would be some form of susension or ban. What??? You're calling for someone to be banned...and you don't even know what they've done? Hope you're never on a jury. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 What??? You're calling for someone to be banned...and you don't even know what they've done? Hope you're never on a jury. well... martin taylor got a 3 match ban for breaking eduardo's leg and there was no maliscious intent there. And i dont want to be on a jury so i agree with you MiM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr? Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Hey there my fellow football supporters and players! After finally making an apperance on this website i would just like to say hello im Mr?.. First of all... after seein the tackle in which Micheal Owers was seriously injured i would without a doubt say it was done WITHOUT intend! The tackling player was going for the ball and it was a complete accident! Now on the topic of bad fouls... i would like to say a keen challenge without intend is better then kick a player while down on the ground were the ball is no were 2 be seen! So an 8 match ban for Mr Saunders is justified! But i dont think an large ban is needed for the challenge on Mr Owers.. a 3 match ban would be justified with maybe a small fine for the club? Also reading about the UnstFc-Whalsay game.... Unst were short of main players and younsters aged 15 were playing like the goalie Micheal Thompson who played outstandin! With the A league finally started no one actually reliseas how bad the Delting side will become in the near future... Most of the talented young players have moved to Mossbank Fc while Craig Jarvie moved to Ness United and Liam MacGregor moved to Unst Fc. All i can say is gd luck to all! Mr? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EISTnWAST Posted May 9, 2008 Report Share Posted May 9, 2008 Hate to be the one to use a bit of common sense , but the recent leg-break incident must go unpunished. Just because the injury was serious people are calling for 3 match bans. You can't punish a player who did nothing wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penfold Posted May 9, 2008 Report Share Posted May 9, 2008 If the referee didn't cite the player in question for the tackle then there is no grounds for taking disciplinary action against him, the case of Mr Saunders and Mr Mouat is different as both were cited for offences in the referee's report from the game. It should be a warning to clubs and players that any offences of the type they were sent off for can and may result in lenghty bans, as the precedent has been set. If you wish to appeal the ban you can raise it with the SAFA in Glasgow who will hold a hearing which as a player and club you have to attend at your own cost and run the risk of the committee finding the your parent association was to soft with the punishment and increase your ban. The offence that Mr Saunders was banned for can carry a 5 YEAR BAN. So think on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brokenlink Posted May 9, 2008 Report Share Posted May 9, 2008 penfold you may be able to answer this but when was the Shetland Football Association constitution amended and formally approved to fall into line with the Scottish Amateur Football Association? And having looked at the SAFA constitution online where does the maximum of 5 years come from? As I understand it Mr Saunders and Mr Mouat where charged with standard offences with fixed suspensions so where does the 5 year ban come in? Was that the Shetland Football Association viewpoint? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.