Jump to content

British National Party


Which party do you vote for?  

32 members have voted

  1. 1. Which party do you vote for?

    • Labour
      4
    • Conservative
      1
    • Lib Dem
      9
    • Greens
      5
    • UKIP
      3
    • SNP
      5
    • BNP
      6


Recommended Posts

its the hatred that's the same. one group whether they are Jewish/blacks or anyone else separated because they are what they are. The BNP are not a joke they are a dangerous threat to this country. Were lucky that our parliamentary democracy was strong enough to reject mossley and his chums. Are we still in the same state this time. If even one of there's gets into either Europe or Westminster then we need to become very scared for this country. i would hate to see this country become like France with 10% NF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 526
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

European facists recrute in the catholic church because that is where their brand of racism finds a natural home.

 

Nick Griffin being compared to Nelson Mandela

 

two differances between them N.G. is white and N.M. is black, N.G. has not as far as I'm aware been convicted or even accused of a violent crime where as N.M. has.

 

yet see how differantly the two of them are treated by the press N.G. a pariah and N.M. a saviour of Africa.

 

double standards like this will only serve the BNP and help them win votes.

 

as the saying goes you tend to get the government you deserve if not the one you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

two differances between them N.G. is white and N.M. is black, N.G. has not as far as I'm aware been convicted or even accused of a violent crime where as N.M. has.

One's black and one's white? Really? Go to the top of the class for that acute piece of observation.

 

As for Nick Griffin being your model of virtue... heaven forbid you take 1 minute to try and learn something about the man and the company (hint: Mark Collett) he keeps. Either that or carry on cherry picking.

 

yet see how differantly the two of them are treated by the press N.G. a pariah and N.M. a saviour of Africa.

 

double standards like this will only serve the BNP and help them win votes.

Uh, yeah. I can see how some people would think like that just to try and justify their own pitiful beliefs. I'm sure you're clever enough not vote for them based on that kind of BS though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mandella was not racist. He was fighting for the rights of the majority people. As was evident when he came to power not like there neighbour.

 

The Bnp are not freedom fighters, they aim to take peoples freedoms away.

 

But i would not worry even if every adult voted for them on Shetland it would have little to no impact on who got in.

 

Barring them and treating them as diffrent to other political parties is also rather shortsighted. If you treat them as anyother party you take away there excuse that they are the repressed representives of the majority. %This rule would have to apply to all wacko groups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By December 1936, HJ membership stood at just over five million. That same month, HJ membership became mandatory, under the Gesetz über die Hitlerjugend law. This legal obligation was re-affirmed in 1939 with the Jugenddienstpflicht and HJ membership was required even when it was opposed by the member's parents. From then on, most of Germany's teenagers belonged to the HJ. By 1940, it had eight million members. Later war figures are difficult to calculate, since massive conscription efforts and a general call-up of boys as young as ten years old meant that virtually every young male in Germany was, in some way, connected to the HJ. Only about 10 to 20% were able to avoid joining

I have no idea if he wanted to be a member or not. But everyone of us makes mistakes him included. Even if the pope was a rabid antisemite what has this to do with the BNP. If for one moment the jewish war crime groups thought he had anything to answer they would have been making it very clear.

 

Following his 14th birthday in 1941, Ratzinger was enrolled in the Hitler Youth, as membership was required for all 14-year old German boys after December 1939,[6] but was an unenthusiastic member and refused to attend meetings.[7] His father was a bitter enemy of Nazism, believing it conflicted with the Catholic faith, according to biographer John L. Allen, Jr. In 1941, one of Ratzinger's cousins, a 14-year-old boy with Down syndrome, was taken away by the Nazi regime to a care center and killed there in secrecy during the Aktion T4 euthanasia campaign of Nazi eugenics.[8] In 1943 while still in seminary, he was drafted at age 16 into the German anti-aircraft corps. Ratzinger then trained in the German infantry, but a subsequent illness precluded him from the usual rigours of military duty. As the Allied front drew closer to his post in 1945, he deserted back to his family's home in Traunstein after his unit had ceased to exist, just as American troops established their headquarters in the Ratzinger household. As a German soldier, he was put in a POW camp, but was released a few months later at the end of the war in the summer of 1945. He reentered the seminary, along with his brother Georg, in November of that year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many Germans managed to avoid membership of the hitler youth. And it was only after the war was over that being a member of the nazi party became at odds with being a catholic.

just like it was damn hard to find a german that was a nazi after the war.

old papa nazi himself has even uttered anti semitic words since taking his throne.

 

as i said in a previous post fascists recrute in the catholic church because the too ideoligies go hand in hand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't understand how you can hold hitler youth membership against him. It was mandatory and very few managed to avoid it. Unless you are saying that all germans at that time were inherently bad then it shouldn't be a point of criticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He goes on about the white race being a bit more intelligent, than the black due to genetics . And ironically cant see that the whole interview proves his point wrong in the first place. If he is what it is meant to be,( by having a PHD you’re an educated man) Then there is something to be said for being brain dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...