Capeesh Posted October 15, 2015 Report Share Posted October 15, 2015 The British empire is no more, why would we want to be a British colony? paulb 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasmie Posted October 15, 2015 Report Share Posted October 15, 2015 i guess if the majority of voters want it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ghostrider Posted October 15, 2015 Popular Post Report Share Posted October 15, 2015 (edited) The British empire is no more, why would we want to be a British colony? The Falklands, Gibraltar, British Virgin Islands, Bermuda, Tristan da Cunha and the rest of them seem to be doing okay being ones. As are numerous others with similar status from other nations. Edited October 15, 2015 by Ghostrider brian.smith, BGDDisco, waarigeo and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whalsa Posted October 15, 2015 Report Share Posted October 15, 2015 @Suffererof1crankymofo I am aware all the figures can't come from the SIC. All I was saying is there is much work to be done and this is just the beginning. @Rasmie this campaign is not anti-english or anti-scottish it is pro-Shetland. All we want is control over our own affairs so that we can create a fairer, more efficient, more democratic more prosperous society. You are right about the siphoning of resources. The oil is one thing but the destruction of the fishing industry is in my eyes unforgivable. With self governing status we can ensure that Shetlands interests are never so blatantly ignored again. @Capeesh we would not be a British "colony" we would be a self Governing nation within the British realm. You would not call Faroe a colony of Denmark would you? As a matter of fact the situation we are in now is more like a colony from the Imperial Age, our resources are plundered and sent from our shores to benefit people in a distant land, we have laws imposed on us which we did not choose and have little to no control over, we are often forgotten by people in the rest of the country. I could go on. Obviously we do not suffer the savage brutality of colonial regimes of the past but I was simply making a point. Self government would be much less like a colony than the current set up. brian.smith and BGDDisco 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capeesh Posted October 15, 2015 Report Share Posted October 15, 2015 The British empire is no more, why would we want to be a British colony? The Falklands, Gibraltar, British Virgin Islands, Bermuda, Tristan da Cunha and the rest of them seem to be doing okay being ones. As are numerous others with similar status from other nations.If being a British colony is so great why did most of them leave?You forgot about the native population of the British Indian Ocean Territory who were evicted so the USA and UK could build a military base.Would we have a governor?Would we be the first non colony to want to be a British Overseas territory? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostrider Posted October 15, 2015 Report Share Posted October 15, 2015 If being a British colony is so great why did most of them leave? Perhaps because it best suited their situation(s). Their situation(s) were their's though, not ours, and it would be up to them to answer that. While total independence might be the preferable option in an ideal world, in this one its difficult to see how it would better Shetland's situation, whereas some sort of Overseas Territory, Dependancy or suchlike comes over as potentially viable and beneficial. You forgot about the native population of the British Indian Ocean Territory who were evicted so the USA and UK could build a military base. Didn't "forget" them at all, just didn't mention it as it had no relevance to the point at hand. Population "displacements"/eradications/ethnic cleansing has been performed by just about every nation on earth at one time or another, and by many accounts is still ongoing by a good few even as we speak. A quick trip round relatively recent history will soon prove regardless whether the target are/popultion are a remote micro-nation or a sizeable population on a large land mass, if the boss wants them shifted, they'll be shifted, one way, or another. Would we have a governor?Would we be the first non colony to want to be a British Overseas territory? I don't seem why either or both shouldn't be on the table, and then it would be up to the electorate to choose, or dismiss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eighty7 Posted October 15, 2015 Report Share Posted October 15, 2015 Hi Whalsa, registered to comment on this because I understand and agree with your stance in theory, however I'm a bit concerned in practice - about 3,000 people work for the council, would they all lose their jobs if we decided to disregard the Scottish government? What happens to mortgages and bank accounts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capeesh Posted October 15, 2015 Report Share Posted October 15, 2015 I think Shetland could benefit from more autonomy, I just don't think the UK government would be that supportive but I'm not going to labour the point more than I have already.Gonna bow out now, but will read with interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ghostrider Posted October 16, 2015 Popular Post Report Share Posted October 16, 2015 Something that's been mentioned by a couple of previous posters, but not really been followed up on is Orkney. Have any feelers been put out to see if there's a similiar groundswell of desire for change there as here? Certainly if the numbers add up, going it alone whichever way its decided to be done is a perfectly acceptable way ahead, but, to my way of thinking at least, a united effort with Orkney, if we both want broadly the same outcome, makes twice as much sense. There's always been ties between the two island groups (although perhaps more so the further south in Shetland you go), we don't (usually) fight (that much) , on the "important stuff" anyway, and we have the potential to compliment each other with our natural assets. Orkney is a lot of farmers and a handful of fishermen, Shetland is a lot of fishermen and a handful of crofters, Shetland would struggle to feed itself unless we all ate fish and not much else for almost every meal, and unless Orkney has suddenly increased its fleet size, their landings struggle to meet local demand. Together we can put together a pretty decent menu any time of year, alone, we both struggle a bit, and then there's the potential of double the clout whever you need if from a united Northern Isles' combined populations, territorial waters, etc etc. whalsa, BGDDisco, George. and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whalsa Posted October 16, 2015 Report Share Posted October 16, 2015 Hi Whalsa, registered to comment on this because I understand and agree with your stance in theory, however I'm a bit concerned in practice - about 3,000 people work for the council, would they all lose their jobs if we decided to disregard the Scottish government? What happens to mortgages and bank accounts? In the event of autonomy there would be a transition phase, it would not happen overnight. While the SIC in its current incarnation would cease to exist there would still be a large public sector for employees to work in as potentially we would have more departments and services to provide on our own. The aim of this campaign is to make everyone better off not cause mass unemployment. Regarding mortgages and bank accounts it would be ensured that these were unaffected. @Ghostrider I believe there has been some contact between the group and people in Orkney but I will have to check. Incidentally I agree with you, the two island groups would compliment each other well IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BGDDisco Posted October 16, 2015 Author Popular Post Report Share Posted October 16, 2015 Yes, it would be interesting to hear what our neighbours' thoughts on this would be. I get the feeling there is a lot more SNP support in Orkney, as compared to here.I totally agree a united campaign from both archipelagos would add recognition to the argument. Think about it - Shetland doesn't even appear on a lot of TV weather maps, Orkney does. I worked in London from 1986-89, no-one knew or cared to know where or what Shetland was - including a few central belt Scots. Although this may have changed a little, what with moonwalking ponies, Ann Cleeves dramatisations etc etc Kavi Ugl, whalsa and Ghostrider 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fionajohn Posted October 16, 2015 Report Share Posted October 16, 2015 Divide and conquer ...Westmonster ploy that has served them well so far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post whalsa Posted October 16, 2015 Popular Post Report Share Posted October 16, 2015 Divide and conquer ...Westmonster ploy that has served them well so far fionajohn this is no ploy by Westminster I assure you. This is a grass-roots political movement started by the people of Shetland for the people of Shetland. The only way we will be "conquered" is if we allow things to continue the way they are instead of standing up for ourselves. George., Windwalker, Kavi Ugl and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urabug Posted October 16, 2015 Report Share Posted October 16, 2015 Divide and conquer ...Westmonster ploy that has served them well so far fionajohn this is no ploy by Westminster I assure you. This is a grass-roots political movement started by the people of Shetland for the people of Shetland. The only way we will be "conquered" is if we allow things to continue the way they are instead of standing up for ourselves. started by the people of Shetland for the people of Shetland ---correction, started by a group of people in Shetland for some of the people of Shetland . I'm one of many people in Shetland that so far has not agreed to anything so therefore should not be included ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whalsa Posted October 16, 2015 Report Share Posted October 16, 2015 Divide and conquer ...Westmonster ploy that has served them well so far fionajohn this is no ploy by Westminster I assure you. This is a grass-roots political movement started by the people of Shetland for the people of Shetland. The only way we will be "conquered" is if we allow things to continue the way they are instead of standing up for ourselves. started by the people of Shetland for the people of Shetland ---correction, started by a group of people in Shetland for some of the people of Shetland . I'm one of many people in Shetland that so far has not agreed to anything so therefore should not be included ! Apologies Urabug I of course was not presuming to speak on behalf of everyone in Shetland! I was merely pointing out that this is entirely home grown and isn't some sinister plot by the Tories or anyone else. The group may have been started by a small number of Shetlanders but believe me when I say the intention is for our campaign to benefit everyone. Of course everyone is entitled to their opinion. I hope a majority of Shetlanders will support the campaign but I certainly don't assume they will. Support has to be earned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now