wotsit Posted December 9, 2015 Report Share Posted December 9, 2015 Are you saying we need a public enquiry into the "goings on" in SIC planning dept? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorrie Posted December 10, 2015 Report Share Posted December 10, 2015 Why has the applicant put up a sign banning people from the public beach below the house? With the Scottish 'right to roam', the notice is as out of place as the planning department decision If he's guilty of doing that, then he's just lost my support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulb Posted December 10, 2015 Report Share Posted December 10, 2015 unless its banning dog walking then he cant stop folks. you could always ask why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wotsit Posted December 10, 2015 Report Share Posted December 10, 2015 The planners have refused planning permission, and Henry is going for an appeal - The Review Body. I wonder how biased that is going to be, no doubt local politics will come into their decision, will he get a fair shot ?? Good luck, I'm sure you will have a lot of support locally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorrie Posted December 11, 2015 Report Share Posted December 11, 2015 unless its banning dog walking then he cant stop folks. you could always ask why. If someone's trying to stop dogs running loose amongst livestock, then I've some sympathy. But we'll be drifting into a separate issue if we go down this road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George. Posted December 11, 2015 Report Share Posted December 11, 2015 Still haven't heard one single reason to back up the S.I.C planning departments decision to refuse permission for Parkgate Pizzas. Do they have some financial interest in another restaurant somewhere or are they just naturally unreasonable. Of course, they may be right and if so, they should be closing down each and every restaurant, cafe and probably all the hotels that are scattered across the isles, including the places that they frequent themselves. Of course, I may well be right in thinking that their decision is totally asinine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BGDDisco Posted December 11, 2015 Report Share Posted December 11, 2015 Darwinian natural selection business-wise will be the deciding factor in whether it succeeds or not, regardless of cynical / sceptical / jobsworth / conniving planners decisions. I personally think it would be successful, certainly in the short term / until the novelty has worn off. Every dog has his day and all that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wotsit Posted December 11, 2015 Report Share Posted December 11, 2015 The decision should not be made on Shetland - too much local politics at play.If Henry is to get a fair hearing a decision needs to be made outwith Shetland.Too many fingers in the pies pardon the pun. sure this is not the first and will not be the last time SIC planning dept act with such a distorted view on things to supress certain planning applications. It would be interesting to see how many others have had such similar problems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mogling Posted December 15, 2015 Report Share Posted December 15, 2015 I just noticed something: "Mr MacColl, who is half Italian, wanted to build a single-storey detached restaurant, seating 24, beside his home... ...But the planning department refused the application because the pizzeria was not located within or adjacent to an “existing settlement”. "Settlement: a place, typically one which has previously been uninhabited." Assuming that Mr MacColl's house already exists at Parkgate, would that not constitute an "existing settlement" that he could build a pizza place "adjacent to"? George. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bug Posted December 16, 2015 Report Share Posted December 16, 2015 Things we want tae know : Is it da Masons or the Mansons that used to frequent Parkgate for a purl i'da tide tae mak a buk ur twa? Whit's da idder half o' MacF*all med o'? (canna possibly be a Neopolitan wi yun use o' de language) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wotsit Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 When is a settlement NOT a settlement ? - when the council do not want it to be is the answer, good luck Mr McColl Frances144 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ll Posted December 17, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 Remote eateries? As far as I can gather, seems to be quite a few then that Mr Holden from planning would not approve of, including the world renowned Three Chimneys in remote Isle of Syke http://www.welcometoscotland.com/blog/2013/05/03/remote-places-to-eat-in-scotland-top-10/ http://www.corrour-station-house-restaurant.co.uk/ http://threechimneys.co.uk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capeesh Posted December 18, 2015 Report Share Posted December 18, 2015 Was he was planning to deliver?That carbon footprint would have clown feet then. Girzie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wotsit Posted December 19, 2015 Report Share Posted December 19, 2015 Surely that would go for any firm that delivers ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frances144 Posted December 19, 2015 Report Share Posted December 19, 2015 When is a settlement NOT a settlement ? - when the council do not want it to be is the answer, good luck Mr McCollWhen it's not Lerwick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now