KOYAANISQATSI

http://www.freegames.ws/games/boardgames/mahjong/mahjong.htm

lol; well you haven't made it it easy for me. I'll remember to bring my decoder ring with me next time.

@NorthernXposure: I'll attempt to reason with you troll, instead of just feeding you but I don't hold out much hope of helping you reach any kind of self realization. Just pointing out the obvious glaring anomallies in your thought process really and yes I'd enjoy watching you fail to explain yourself. You see in the first post, you seem to state that government would not cause any harm and does not act against me; while the second brings up illegal wars started by government and human rights being contravened because of government procedure. You don't think these two points clash in any way? No paradox there, no? Nothing about holding both those viewpoints that defies intuition for you? You didn't just paint something black then shout at me for not seeing it as white? explain this GO @Sumburgh Radar Not seen any military fighters but like I said, I've seen 6 in the sky at the same time, laying down the trails; would 6 high altitude planes in the same area at exactly the same time be an unusual thing? ps Your touching down here is much appreciated, now I know you're the real thing. Please do stick around as we may have more questions for you and not just from me and my "little radicals" but for more general, down to earth type questions involving our air traffic flow. pps Seen the photos you'd taken while I was having a nose around to check your story out. Some cool stuff there, you should stick the link up on the boards somewhere; this lot would love that sorta stuff.

@Sumburgh Radar Thank you for the information; however getting someone to tell you an individuals flight plan is not the same as being in on a need to know basis for any military or governmental purpose of flight. Oh, one last thing NorthernXposure... http://www.shetlink.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=149228#149228 Don't cross the streams dude.

Very very poorly what? I had not referred to you as anything until now, when, yes you may now include yourself as one of "the said". If you think everything in the world is conducted without secrecy and with full public consent, then fair enough. If you think anyone who thinks otherwise is insane for doing so and use this view as an attack on their reasoning, then I'm quite happy to return the favour. Is this why I "diserve" your contempt? because I have an opinion you do not agree with? But of course you're not here to discuss anything are you? No, you're here as the worthless troll you are and shall be ignored as such. At least gibber brings his IQ with him when he comes a trollin. What happened to yours? leave it on the special bus did we? You don't have to answer, I'm finished with you anyway.

I don't know; that depends very much on how you conduct yourself in discussions of this type.

No. It goes on well beyond the North sea and parts of Shetland.

Ok, lets say I believe You are an Air Traffic Controller. I'll go out on a limb and even risk thinking of you as basically honest; hell I'll even believe you if you tell me your cats called Polly and that you love to pick your nose. I'll withdraw the shill remark, as I know it can be irritating when other people ascribe their own labels for folk. I doubt you are informed on the true purpose of every flight that moves under a government or military stamp but can you get any information on the discrepancies in numbers of air traffic moving over Shetland from last summer compared to now? If this can be carried on without tin foil hat related screamings; I'd be much obliged; besides, there's already a fair share of dickheads around, that see this as their sole purpose in some discussions.

I'm not interested in why you're either ignorant or a liar. You didn't answer the question; why were there so many planes flying every day, in every other direction, wherever a patch of clear sky was, this time last year? and why are they totally absent now? You know the ones; white, all at high altitude and (unless they were on the return run) all leaving "contrails" that lingered for hours. I phoned Sumburgh myself and lied about who I was and why I was phoning and was told the jets didn't really have anything to do with them and that it was that they were operating from, which I might add, has continued its traditional strategic role as a refuelling point for military aircraft – the USAF, RAF and the Canadian Forces Air Command. So, once again, where are the large number of these non-suspicious planes this year. There's been the odd one or two and I've seen 6 in view at the same time this year but since about April, not one. Are you going to tell me there's been that much of a drop in transatlantic flight bookings this year.

You can confirm nothing if you have not been told what has been going on and unless you can confirm who you are, why should you be trusted in any way. Either that or you're just happy to lie for whatever cause they told you, you were backing. Since we're here, it has been noticed that no chemtrails have been seen here for weeks; wasamatter, run out of barium? Where are the twenty to thirty planes a day that was overhead this time last year leaving trails from horizon to horizon, which stayed in place for 2 to even 3 hours before spreading to cover the sky in murky chem haze? I don't think for a second that every sumburgh skivvy will be told of the global agenda but is this thread what drew you down from your fat controllers chair to the forums, just to make this your first post? This and your added dismissal of "conspiracy theorists" as if they are just of one mindset, to group as a whole and ignore because you know for a fact that black ops are not the sort of thing we should expect out of our governments and in such a short post, points you out for exactly what you are. I did notice that you joined us in the same week that this was discussed on another thread, last year but chose to bide your time till now before swinging your little hammer of ultimate truth. Why is this? Who am I going to trust; some shill or my lying eyes?

Exactly; there is VAT on tampons and sanitary towels, condoms and other contraceptives. Just stop buying them, intead of reveling in luxury.

First it was all... http://chandra.harvard.edu/press/06_releases/press_082106.html Then it was like... http://www.dur.ac.uk/news/newsitem/?itemno=10230 They did add the obligatory disclaimer... Still, at least it seems like some kind of shuffle in the right direction.

http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/science_and_environment/10342318.stm It's their own, one model, small world, fixed view. It's got to the point that if they found the loch ness monster, they'd find a way to link it to CO2 levels. There are other options you hear a lot less about... You'd almost think they were quite sure about what it's distinct from. Yet... http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2009/solarminimum.jsp If they continue to look away from the Sun for their answers, they're always going to find themselves chasing their own shadows.

http://www.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/news/article/default.aspx?objid=71491 More conspiracy nonsense?

http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/meeting2010.html Are they inducing global cooling, or preventing it?

Odds on it's more than just one cat that you've got back.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJG7Wj5hDFM&feature=player_embedded http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILIRSsGyXKM&feature=player_embedded#at=147 Both vids are parts of bigger sets; all worth watching but these two are good pointers about the self contradictory mathematical universe, they have given you to believe in and reasons why you won't hear about any other theory outside of the so called consensus view. Many in academia seem to believe that "peer-reviewed" research guarantees impartial, sound and independent assessment. It does not. Mavericks can be marked down and dismissed by their consensus-minded peers. Dissension is rarely popular.

I get what your going for with that and in a roundabout kinda way, I sorta agree with what you're saying. It's at the added on derivations of Einsteins maths, like big bang, black holes and dark matter...etc, that I really balk...(although these used to be among my favourite things to read about). I better add that the electric universe theory is not anything of my making but just where I ended up after I lost all faith in the big bang and black holes and went in search of a new beginning...or not, as the case may be. Anyhoo...beg pardon, topic on, not.

Ahem... What it does “explain†is far out-weighed by what it does not explain.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPHdk6WgbUg I dunno lol

Israel hardly holds the moral highground when it comes to clarity and reasonable definition... http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=177445

Thing is; it's not a million miles away from the "holy truth" for some. Read any good books lately?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/04/gaza-flotilla-activists-autopsy-results

I know of spots where the tide would come in houses in Shetland on a new moon and would make it a good two feet deep in the front room. Seen it happen a few times in my life but never this century. No drainage issues involved.