Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by KOYAANISQATSI

  1. Well done Gibber, you did get ONE thing demonstrably false, although the point remains that the gassings in the church was a lie told from world war one. I was the one who found the source when asked, that showed it false after investigation and displayed it as such, unlike yourself who just shuffled past the many other points I raised I'm not going through requoting the whole thread again. If you want to restart it; fine. I may join in when I have time but if it means debating history with the likes of paulb, who thinks that people 2000 years ago could roll big stones away from thier own tomb and run for it and yourself who bends truth like Einstein bends space, then we may be there some time. It's true, I've found him. Oh and Terminator 2
  2. There you go again Gibber... Make your mind up mate; I was more than happy to debate the facts of the holocaust, even up against your intellectual level of misrepresentation, prevarication and obfuscation but you were determined to see the thread locked; Yet just as determined to use it to launch your little guerella attacks from almost every other thread. Quite so; in fact I'd have gone further; It's not so much being a Zionist that makes a trouble maker, more how a corrupt system of beliefs and ideals can affect the individual and how they choose to use them. Bob Dylan is a Zionist and a fine fellow; Albert Einstein another; alright he had some crazy ideas about time and space but I would have liked to have seen how things would have looked today, if he had taken up the prime minister position when offered. People can be played like old fiddles by governments, religions and the like, to fall into the old same traps again and again and again and the cycle seems unlikely to be broken anytime soon. Yes it is gavva, it is exactly the fault of people like you, who will give up on reason and go running after the belief that a man (sorry mangod) can walk on water, raise people from the dead, rise from the dead, turn water into wine and feed thousands with two fish, to the point that you can hate an entire group of people some two thousand year later, by spreading the ridiculous, holy truth of the Crucifixion around, like so much cancer; fostering many shades of hate as you do so. Gibber just likes to play the bad stereotype so he can reinforce his own conviction that anyone who disagrees with him is an anti semite and justify his own position to himself. If anyone saw the channel 4 documentary "Defamation" by a young Jewish film maker; it gave a pretty good description of how the Zionist system works to mould its young into the paranoid damaged people they want for the cause. I don't know what the Whitehouse has to say on the boat incident but at a stab in the dark, I bet words like "a regrettable loss of life" have been the choice. I don't imagine they would be as softly softly if it had gone down the same but with the tables turned. As for what will happen over it... Not much I guess, except peace getting further away.
  3. A brawl would suggest both parties reducing it to name calling. For my part; I only asked for clarification over some rather unfair sounding, sweeping generalisations made about Shetland. However any attempt, at keeping it lightsome was met with ever more fury.
  4. Thanks gavva for getting the correct name to the person you were quoting this time; if you put an extra "] on the end of the persons name, you will also get a little white box to place the quoted post in. And thanks for noting my fashionable and elegant bottom, however this doesn't really answer my question.
  5. Shetland is a group of islands in the north sea; it is my understanding that land masses have no opinion on the issues you raise. If you mean the people... 1 - Do we have a sufficient number of instances to draw a conclusion? 2 - Is the breadth of the conclusion drawn supported by the evidence? 3 - Are the terms of the conclusion consistent with the terms of the evidence? Fallacies may result if any of these questions can be answered in the negative.
  6. I make it 203 people posting and 185183 Views so I wouldn't say your "1 or 2" estimate is entirely accurate.
  7. Lets not speak to soon. I myself am keenly waiting by the letter box for a check to arrive from Mr Clark, to cover me for my recent rent increases, as I'm sure non of us envy the time he must have spent in Tenerife; having to lie out in the sun and suffer the horror of knowing the extra financial burden he would be placing on so many because of his complete failure to do his job and still get a truck load of cash for it. Perhaps we should have a whip round and sell a couple extra spare school buildings, to see if we can raise enough to get him a swimming pool or something for his new digs, to help ease the stress this must've all caused him. I for one wish him every happiness with all the money since I wont be able to put the extra bit I'm now paying, towards savings for my family so someone might as well enjoy it. So have a drink on me Clarkie; sod it, in fact just down the whole bottle, I'm sure there's plenty more where that one came from.
  8. Not when they're trying cupid stunts before my window all day and night.
  9. Yes that would be wrong, is does sound awfully similar to your what your doing without having been an expert to begin with. Not similar at all really. When this thread began, I was still a believer in AGW; it was my growing interest in plasma cosmology and how well its theories relate to observations that in the end led me away from the fold. The strength of a theory can be shown in its ability to predict and the likes of Wallace Thornhill are having a field day in seeing their predictions come true, only to be totally ignored by all mainsteam scientific publications. Now you may well be right that I am not an expert in either climate, relativity mathmatics or even plasma cosmology but after catching a youtube entitled H.A.A.R.P shooting at UFO... With a still very limited understanding of the electric universe it was nevertheless clear to me, that this had less to do with HAARP and ufo's and more to do with the Earths plasma sheath repelling incoming space debris and following it up with a plasma discharge. This got me thinking that if that's how it can play out on earth; then there must be far greater reaction to things like so called comets when they get to close to the Sun so with no prior knowledge about such a thing ever being seen, I went for a google through mainstream pages, using words like Sun, comets & coronal mass ejection; which was the type of thing I was expecting to find and the funny thing is, I did; again and again and again, while the experts as you would call them, said and I quote "A spectacular coincidence - We were speechless when we saw this". When it comes down to an idiot on a pc, like me, beating NASA at their own game, then perhaps it is time for everyone to start to wonder if something is indeed amiss in the ruling paradigms. The same of course goes for any climate change; the effect that the Sun has on driving both weather and climate, can in no way be discounted by any mainstream expert, if they have completely failed to understand the Sun as an electrical phenomenon and the interactions it has with its planetary bodies. Again, not really. For instance; Habibullo Abdussamatov, the head of space research at St. Petersburg's Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in Russia, says that we're heading for a new "Little Ice Age" in 2014. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=155225 I have no idea if he is correct or not so I wouldn't say I'm rushing to him in any way, although he is at least pointing his theory in the right direction by saying that Sun activity determines temperatures. A vet or a biologist is indeed a better expert in the case of cats, rather than just a cat owner. (except the cat owner I had imagined was both a biologist and a vet) but if you want experts who know why the big stuff out there combusts then sooner or later you will have to look to those who can see an electric Universe for the eternally unified field it is.
  10. Nice straw man there, Koy. And now you'll be telling us that because forest fires can be caused by lightning, it's impossible for one to be started by arson? I was not using it to say that because of what we know it disproves the other but was just using it alongside looking at the claim that because someone gets the title climate expert; that this somehow equates to climate change expert, which is not included in their experience and the factors involved which may well be outside of their expertise.
  11. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatology It is hardly an exact science yet. A cat owner may be called an expert on their cat but if it bursts into flames one day, that doesn't mean that they automatically know why. Yes and no; it doesn't make them less of an expert but if they choose only one perspective to view the anomaly and it is incorrect, then all you get is a lot of wasted time and money. It's not what you've got, it's where you stick it, that counts.
  12. People were there in 1066 and kept written records of the battle so any expertise would be gained from the study of the historical record of the event. Your Comparison is akin to saying; Carol Vorderman is an expert with numbers, in the same way Yvette Fielding is an expert on ghosts.
  13. It's a bit of a misnomer to call anyone a climate change expert, since no one alive has any experience whatsoever, on any past climate change and neither do they receive any of their scientific training from anyone who has experience of any past climate change. The one thing we know for sure, is that any information we can gain on any previous climate change, would clearly show that it was not man made.
  14. Kanellos; riot dog. http://i42.tinypic.com/a9pbvm.jpg http://i42.tinypic.com/b7j1pg.jpg http://i43.tinypic.com/es7tjc.jpg http://i39.tinypic.com/so1u69.png http://i43.tinypic.com/2zial3b.jpg http://i41.tinypic.com/34in11y.jpg http://i42.tinypic.com/2a8ov3d.jpg http://i39.tinypic.com/bhf536.jpg http://i42.tinypic.com/t0kjl3.jpg http://i43.tinypic.com/2e0to2h.jpg http://i44.tinypic.com/dyouc5.jpg http://i42.tinypic.com/v5z5f8.jpg http://i40.tinypic.com/11qsgia.jpg http://i42.tinypic.com/2n00f2q.jpg http://i40.tinypic.com/vs2yk7.jpg http://i44.tinypic.com/sxcdqc.jpg http://i40.tinypic.com/15wbcdu.jpg http://i44.tinypic.com/2a9phxc.jpg http://i40.tinypic.com/jrbo5g.jpg http://i41.tinypic.com/neytjk.jpg http://i44.tinypic.com/2aij3mt.jpg http://i40.tinypic.com/2hhfw9g.jpg http://i41.tinypic.com/30vdx7b.jpg http://i39.tinypic.com/2nt9xk.jpg http://i43.tinypic.com/15ocoaq.jpg http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/gallery/2010/may/06/greece-protest
  15. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sM1Ahn0Osjo&feature=player_embedded I'm sorry. That is all.
  16. http://i44.tinypic.com/11b6n2s.jpg You didn't have a dog called Rex. Nobody has a dog called Rex. http://serve.mysmiley.net/indifferent/indifferent0028.gif
  17. You have nothing except what ever ad hominem you're limping to the barn with today in your endless troll quest, as you trail after me on thread after thread after thread. The fact that there is no time dilation is just that; FACT. Whatever your thoughts on the why or where that I say it is irrelevant because the fact remains and is relevant to the topic at hand. Your only angle outside the usual, under hand abusive troll posts and dishonesty is to say that I must be wrong because everyone sane knows the theory of relativity to be correct. Logical fallacies may be popular but as a tool to try and make yourself look a bit smarter than you really are makes your position seem, as I said; pretty lame.
  18. ^Is there any way I can block me having to view this twats posts. He has nothing to add to the debate and I have absolutely no need for any advice from him.
  19. It goes a little something like this... http://research.aerology.com/aerology-analog-weather-forecasting-method/
  20. They don't make park benches like they used to.
  21. Well lets just try the last two... Yet KOI 74b sits there as a 39,000 degree Celsius glaring anomaly in what you think it takes to be a star and it is not alone. You said earlier on this thread that time dilation is proof of relativity yet when Mike Hawkings finds none between the Quasars; which all but shatters the theory; then all of a sudden you don't have the time, nor the inclination to point out the misrepresentation and misunderstanding. There is no misunderstanding. There is no time dilation to be found because there is no such thing as time dilation. Thing is, this is not likely to happen, as I'm sure you well know. The bodies which rule the peer review system would never have a paper accepted if it disagrees with relativity. Any paper that goes against relativity, would still have to be shown to work within the relativity model. Catch 22 a gogo. Might as well go and ask the pope for a sainthood for having proof that Jesus is not at all the person that the church tells us he is. Oh and I like this obscure forum fine; it helps me find more stuff to look up about real science while debating with the crank creationists who follow the big bang. Want an experiment for proof? Fold a piece of A4 paper up. I can get about seven folds tops and it's no where near the size of a singularity. Now imagine trying it with the whole universe... Bet you a tenner, It won't fit.
  22. http://i42.tinypic.com/ogi72f.jpg Lame guys, just lame.
  • Create New...