Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by KOYAANISQATSI

  1. Yes well; you shouldn't be so trusting of everything you read on the toilet walls when you're down the morton lodge.
  2. It's the only reason I get up in the morning and punch things.
  3. I would have thought it common knowledge by now, that the quickest way to gain the label of f***tard on a public forum, is to enter in and start shouting in caps (not counting usernames if your important enough) The next fastest way is to promote David(I'm not saying it was aliens; but it was aliens)Icke. Strangely Popcorn seems to have overlooked these things; although claiming to be too long in the tooth with internet debate to argue. Who needs Richard Dawkins to tell them the Jesus myth is a crock of s**t and who needs Icke for anything? The mind boggles. all that aside... You used to love telling folk who pointed to Jane Standly reporting on buildings that had fallen down while she stood in front of the building that hadn't yet fallen down; as posting ignorant drivel. When it was proven that your own research there was sadly lacking, your position was promptly abandoned without a word of apology to the "ignorant drivelers" http://oi46.tinypic.com/vwxydt.jpg As much as I trust your expertise on these things Scorrie I feel a second opinion is needed here... Do you think the likes of demolition expert Danny Jowenko (now deceased) spent much money on Icke? Please attempt to answer the question without resorting to the usual (Ha Ha! the moron believes what youtube tells him) response. Danny died in an odd little crash but his opinion is not just that of one man. As of 2010 there are 1,354 architects and engineers (or eejits, as you call them) joining the call for answers. http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/407-buildingwhat-appears-on-geraldo-at-large-on-fox-news.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYJfKzkTEoU&feature=related Odd! I remember Geraldo waving away a whole croud of '911 deniers' while calling them kooks so who knows why the turn around on his position. Maybe it's just the complete lack of research he has put in. Maybe he lacks something through brain defects caused by rampant inbreeding. Maybe he's just a small minded man who in order to feel safe; has decided to spend his time shouting down those he disagrees with, using only his faith in seeing things he has seen on a channel 5 documentary. Maybe he just needs some professional help to find his way through the maze of cognitive dissonance... Or maybe he's just in a grouch because if the geoengineering of the skies go's ahead, he wont be able to find his summer.
  4. I can say what the hell I want. Just because your church states gravity is created within; instead of the more obvious reason, of being the effect of other forces; this will make no odds on the behavior of comets. Once the hocus pocus is rejected, there can be only one alternative. Taking your bible to the rest of the galaxy or Universe at large, you must be feeling a bit silly at the scale of the imbalance in your numbers; hence the need for the priests of Mond to be drafted in. You don't really play by even your own rules, do you Brian? You're not here to attempt any understanding of the EU but more just to be the deniers spokesperson, muddy the water and nit pick anything that you can find that I may not be fully versed on. In summery; you waste my time. I already have everything I need from debating on Shetlink and have little interest in sharing any more ideas with the mostly slack jawed left overs, that now dominate the board. The comet is a semi conductor; the solar wind is an electrolyte and the material at the comet surface would act as a dielectric, discharging through dielectric layers. You can use that as a model to go on but I doubt that those who own the equipment to check, have any more real interest to check it out than you do. This may turn out to be claptrap but don't for one minute think your team own this game or for that matter, should have ever been invited to the party in the first place. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18725161.300-comet-tails-of-the-unexpected.html
  5. My god man! are you suggesting that the Queen of England, defender of the faith and supreme Governor of the Church of England, has been herself involved in some conspiracy to mislead her subjects into some false belief and that Yahweh is no better than David bloody Icke's, lizard bloody things!!! Are you trying to say that the people who wave and cheer her, are no better than those at a bressay barn dance and that they're all just f****** sheep!!! AFTER ALL SHE'S DONE FOR YOU!!! what with the waving and the tourists and the 60 years dignity and the wonderful job she's doing... How very dare you sir!!!
  6. Nothing to see here, everything's normal, perfectly normal. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2155450/Climate-engineering-cure-global-warming-turn-sky-WHITE-claim-scientists.html
  7. At first I was all... http://oi49.tinypic.com/28rnkfc.jpg http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jun/29/climate-war-lovelock but then I was like... http://oi49.tinypic.com/14v1j02.jpg http://worldnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/23/11144098-gaia-scientist-james-lovelock-i-was-alarmist-about-climate-change
  8. Little voice no.2 has kept asking; "wtf did he say there?" and little voice no.42 keeps suggesting that this may be my fault for not understanding the question. We all agree that since your asking; it must be some kind of big deal, so without being at all sure what issue the question represents... I began my investigation, by going to my favorite conspiracy site 'Shetlink' and typed in "mulder and scully"; This led me directly to this. What did it all mean? Does an odservation related to an event serve as evidence? could I trust these cranks? is Ghostrider actually getting worse? Surley not! and besides; just what the hell does this have to do with anything, anyway? To be honest Brian; I wasn't sure. Were there really satallites in space? http://lunarmeteoritehunters.blogspot.co.uk/2011_09_01_archive.html There must be a deeper meaning, so I went to an expert; Youtube! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLG_x-zXWJI Comets, Meteoroids, satellites? What hell is going on and what was the original question again? I just didn't know. Rumor has it that a couple of satellites did flunk their orbit exams about this time... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15034073 http://www.space.com/13111-falling-satellite-rosat-november-crash.html I did have a scan through this... http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/columnist/vergano/story/2011-09-25/meteors-satellites/50531542/1 I think I understand your question better now; you mean the comets should be buggering up the electrics and whatnot on them; right? Well, I still don't know. I suppose yes, if there in the right place at the right time, in conjunction to the Sun or something but I doubt there is any more tests run to see if this is the case, than there is run to see if there is any comet and CME interaction or to find out just how charged the average comet is relative to its plasma environment. The plasma environment about the 26th September 2011 did seem a bit stirred up. http://www.shetlink.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=188782#188782 also this But then there were things like these I could disregard the website but the statements make it clear that they had themselves a little Tunguska event and whoever the hell "Jorge Coghlan" is; he could just be on to something there. Then of course there was comet Elenin mentioned there and its alignment maybe more than just a bit player in something being wrong with our plasma sheath that night http://covertnews.blogspot.co.uk/2011/02/september-26th-2011-it-approaches.html I'd read this and that and seen the points made about its last Sun, Earth alignment being on the same day as the Japan Tsunami So I waited up for it. It had been discharging when it was way out in the solar system and had dropped to dark mode after a flare up when it met a CME (ahem) in August. This and the fact that it was inside our orbit this time; didn't have me waiting for the end day but I did kinda hope it had enough potential left for a good light show on the 26th September alignment. I was not disappointed. http://spaceweather.com/aurora/gallery_01sep11_page4.htm http://www.shetlink.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=188782#188782 auroral footprint? The hows, whens and whys that a comet and its effects on earth may play out is not totally clear to me, any more than how, when and why it may interact with our Sun but the cap fits in too many ways to ignore much longer.
  9. EDM could explain the jets and craters but for the water traces I was thinking along these lines... http://www.universetoday.com/41212/yes-theres-water-on-the-moon/ http://www.universetoday.com/41392/water-on-the-moon-what-does-it-mean/ Water on comets, water on the moon and since I gave up on the idea of space snowballs filling up earths basins; I wouldn't mind knowing for sure how the sea came about. I'm not saying it is but there might be a connection here.
  10. electro chemical reaction chains could do the same but it's their gear and they get to release their findings painted as they please to confirm what they think must be the cause. The same with comets and CMEs. With no funding or experiment to check if comets are electric; we have to wait.
  11. Get back to me when you find one with anything like the amount of ice needed for any kind of cometary behavior.
  12. Why? You're gonna have to explain why it 'seems obvious'. This again will require your own analysis and not just a google search of relevant words. While your head is still full of black holes, it's hard to find a better way to explain such a simple feature of an electric universe. Electrical fissioning will relieve the electrical stress on the parent galaxy and a bouncing baby Quasar pops out. That's it; simples. The same fissioning that electrical stars perform and gain companion stars and so galled gas giant planets in doing so; that some would put down as super novas. The clues are all there and it keeps things based in reality, with little need for the inferred mathematical constructs of crazy spin Pulsars and the madness of neutron stars or (god help us) strange matter stars. A structure which has no relation to reality.
  13. I'm not getting dragged down to your level that easy Brian. Because it is a far more plausible explanation and although as far as I know, Arp is not connected with the electric universe crew; his work fits in nicely to connections between bodies seen within the electric universe paradigm. Can't see the join? http://oi45.tinypic.com/o6dz08.jpg http://oi49.tinypic.com/4j3s44.jpg http://oi46.tinypic.com/17dafo.jpg He's still out there, as he puts it "Communicating information on galaxies, quasars and cosmology which ordinarily would not be available in professional journals or the public media." http://astronomy-mall.com/Adventures.In.Deep.Space/arpintro.htm http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/origins_of_quasars_and_galaxy_clusters Himself a case study victim for Machiavellian machinations to suppress; his words are far from irrelevant. Protogalaxies! Born from mature galaxies. Seems obvious compared to some of the crap you read about these days. How are they doing with the auroral footprints these moons leave? http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2000/38/image/a/ NASA's Hubble Telescope website shows the Jovian aurora, with three electrical footprints named, including that from the interaction with Jupiter's third moon. Thus, the original argument that conjectured "volcanoes" produced the signature of electrical transactions in the Jovian auroras has been fully FALSIFIED. The Io plumes are the RESULT of electrical transactions between Jupiter and Io. "the "volcanic" plumes emit ultraviolet light -- something inconceivable under normal conditions of volcanic venting. But ultraviolet light is of course characteristic of an electric arc." ""Filamentary structure" simply does not belong in "volcanic" plumes, but as noted by Gold, Peratt, and Dessler, it is a distinctive feature of the "penumbra" of an electric discharge." Haps maybe it is, haps maybe it isn't. The scale of the thing, still seems beyond total understanding. Just remember what the guide taught us Brian... http://oi45.tinypic.com/15ourmc.jpg
  14. This is largely related to assumptions being the mother of all f*** ups. Look closer... http://oi50.tinypic.com/2h4f3pz.jpg http://electric-cosmos.org/arp.htm Arp got his telescope time taken away for bringing this up and rejected as a maverik and that is why you have not been shown, that which can clearly be seen, once denial and suppression has been overcome. Watch this space! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8myUZsxfCs&feature=player_embedded#!
  15. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8umnc_6TIZg
  16. Meaning what Brian? Does your straw men just get to walk past his window unnoticed? What the hell does that have to do with EU, or did you just think it fitting to mention internet lurking cranks as means to assert your own position on the soap box of the great and good as quite apart from the throng of junk science out there? The EU is a very real and ever growing paradigm who is already knocking hard at the mainstream consensus models door and guess who's first on the block when it breaks. When you say sites with no scientific content; you mean only to those who back the GR horse. Quotes are handy because most around here will not have likely heard whoever say whatever relating to this issue. Where as some more mainstream crap gets shoved down their throats every other day on some telly documentary as if it is the one and only holy truth; voiced over by some mid range hollywood film star. Same goes for the tube of you vids. There are no telly slots for the EU. I could sit all day posting extended writings from Stephen J Crothers, taking your paradigm apart from the inside, clearly showing the weak foundations the castle in the sky is built on but who the hell here would read through them, when N.A.S.A man is here to look up to for truth, justice and the bent space way. So, if I find a vid of Stephen Crothers in the pub putting the record straight; presented by a Franky Howard lookalike; I may well use it. I think more it's your paranoia, that someones attention may be more likely to be caught this way, that unnerves you so. These methods of distraction like your constant whining for me to make a better computer model of an electric galaxy's dynamics, than the one I already pointed to; is a tactic as lame and see through as it gets. Twisting those facts, to suit those theories and claiming that the Universe bends to your ruler is only gonna get you so far. The Big Bang might work as a crap sitcom title but as a ruling paradigm, your sacred cow is bleeding like a stuck pig and not from me but a whole body of pros, who really do know their sh*t stinks much better than yours. The pig must die but it's been hemorrhaging from the inside for a while now... http://www.science20.com/axitronics/blog/bright_energy-85795 http://www.springerlink.com/content/h442q171453638u1/ http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1992SoPh..139..343Z http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1995ApJ...451..391M http://www.springerlink.com/content/x44684452748r256/ http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22circuit+model%22%2Bplasma%2Bcoronal+loops&btnG=Search&as_sdt=0%2C23&as_ylo=&as_vis=1 It'll be a mercy killing when it comes Brian... Putting you out of my misery.
  17. You wouldn't know what you "LAEK" Rivlins; all I see of you, is a brown nose in the back row seats. I'm not alone in my madness you know. Try your own drivlins up against a few of these names... http://www.cosmologystatement.org/
  18. One size fits all... http://oi45.tinypic.com/s66lqw.jpghere http://oi50.tinypic.com/346tljq.jpgIo http://oi49.tinypic.com/c5e8i.jpgsunny side up PLASMA!!! Cause you know that's where the party's at and you'll find out if you do dat. http://www.holoscience.com/news/galileo.htm
  19. They have a dummy kid guy fawkes to burn for the owl bit of the do. Killing real kids is more in their day jobs.
  20. This was the day before . So as you can see, I don't have to wait like everyone else to go mental, as I prefair to go the day before the comet arrives. You can work out the odds on it, if you so wish. I did hear mention of vids by N.A.S.A showing incoming comet, then cutting them before the CME goes off but I didn't check it out, although it wouldn't surprise me a whole lot if this was the case. There could be a number of reasons if it were the case... (1. suppression of real science) Perhaps. It has been known to go on you know. (2. illuminati operatives) Can't underestimate the vested interests, or the lengths they will go to, to keep folk from waking up on mass, to the skies potential for free energy or the exact potential for things like H.A.R.R.P but it's a bit of an outreach to speculate on over a couple of vids about comets. (3. N.A.S.A don't know any better about relevant Sun-comet interactions and cut the vids because they're kinda retarded like that.) More than likely this. I seen them paint in orange lava lakes around the plasma plume on Io, to help people see it as the volcano that they imagine it is. They admit this is what they did when they presented the pics; it's just their reasoning as to why they had to, that was laughable. The comet Neat being the size of Jupiter thing is something I remember seeing Going on when comet elenin was about and some were saying it must be a brown dwarf. This is because most are still in the relativity box and don't yet understand that great size is not needed as negative charge is what holds the potential for shaking things up. I had mentioned it to one brown dwarf fan but was called a satanic shill for doing so. I don't know who this "no one" and "they" are or what they want but yes; there are opinions of all sorts in a world full of people. Don't be silly Brian; I'm not locked in with the internet... The internets locked in with me.
  21. ^The size of its orbit, the size of the rock, how its charge relates to the sun, what it is composed of, or even the position of other planets could be just a few of the factors involved; who knows? Indeed, it's an area that could do with much more research done on it and sooner rather than later but with no funding or even understanding of the electric comet concept by most people, there's no fast answer. As for Mond; I'd say we can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. The Electric Universe is a convergence of ideas from multiple disciplines. Mond is finding new ways to flog a dead horse without daring to crack Einsteins cosmic egg. The matrix still has you Brian. I'd lol if it weren't for the gravity of the situation they have us pinned down with. The horse was still born to begin with but as long as they get payed to flog its by now stinking carcass, then that's just what they're going to do. hmmm No one said it was going to be easy Al.
  22. Correct on all points except the first; EU is of course the real reason for dark matter never having to have been patched on in the first place. To use a Cat Stevens lyric, in what may well become a quote frenzy here... "the patches make the goodbye harder still":wink: There is an endless stream of reports issued to say this one and that one today provides some proof of dark matter and relativity related BB BS; all tied up nicely with some pretty super silly string bow on top. This study is related to counter argument against the maths glitch in the galaxy and using maths to do it. http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2007/11dec_themis/ You and N.A.S.A been sitting listening to old Arthur Eddington too long and not bothered to hear what other people at this party have started talking about; to the point that a language barrier has grown. Mainstream magnetic flux tubes and inter galactic gas snakes have been blowing smoke in your eyes and clouding your vision. http://www.thunderbolts.info/webnews/121707electricsun.htm See, I don't see it like that. OK since you're the big brains on bread here; I'll fess up... I'm no Einstein; al-ja-bra doesn't mean sh*t to me and I could well be the retard sitting at the back of the class in both paradigms of thought, (EU & relativity) who seems to spend most of the time looking out the window lately...(☣===✈) That said; I kinda try to adopt a policeman type approach to these things;...get statements, carry out investigation, weigh evidence and file reports, while mostly leaving the boys at the lab to do the tricky stuff and like your average beat bobby, I may not be very bright but I work hard. Besides, this is Shetlink, where most would rather spend their time talking about people who like to run up walls or hear about scousers pissing on luggage, than worry about the parametric instabilities in their coupled cavities (whatever the hell that is) So the quotes are fun to use as attention grabbing bricks, to lob at your paradigms windows. "The idea that gas can be heated until it gives off intense radiation (extreme ultraviolet and X-rays) without electrical inout, or that a "wave" of ionized particles does not comprise an electric current betrays adherence to outmoded theories despite observational evidence." "ask a kid what a 'magnetic flux tube ball' is... you'll get a blank look then.. ask a kid what a plasma ball is .... you'll get a smile and accurate description of a birkeland current." “Today, nothing is more important to the future and credibility of science than liberation from the gravity-driven universe of prior theory. A mistaken supposition has not only prevented intelligent and sincere investigators from seeing what would otherwise be obvious, it has bred indifference to possibilities that could have inspired the sciences for decades.†sup to you really. I didn't come to discuss how good you are at doing your maths homework. To quote the mighty Combichrist..."Your God, sent us to destroy" Einstein in the end will prove to be nothing but the party pooper; the real life and soul of the party was Tesla but they shut the door to those rooms and you, like many others (including myself for over 30 years) just wandered into the wrong one, assuming that was where the party was at. Oh! While I'm here...
  23. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/04/10/hansen-and-schmidt-of-nasa-giss-under-fire-engineers-scientists-astronauts-ask-nasa-administration-to-look-at-emprical-evidence-rather-than-climate-models/ There is of course the standard issue reality deniers rebuttal... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/13/nasa-climate-change-denier-stunts_n_1424492.html Wut wut? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q577ApejasY&feature=player_embedded#!
  • Create New...