Jump to content

justlookin

Members
  • Posts

    185
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by justlookin

  1. The MoT only ensures the safety of the vehicle for one day. I should have phrased that differently. When your referring to your mode of travel as a "vehicle" or "car" that takes it into statutory realms. "Driving" a "vehicle" is a commercial venture hence the statutory realm. Its a private conveyance for the purpose of travel, that’s common law jurisdiction. Anything can be insured, it just wont be as u normally would in this case.
  2. Yes you can be insured! An insurance company can insure you for anything they wish. He just wont be in the same folder as other car users. Stop trying to scare everyone. The system is corrupt and riddled with expensive paperwork and he is the only one doing something to fight it. An MOT is only valid for the day it taken.
  3. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8584210/The-IPCC-declares-Greenpeace-in-our-time.html This about sums up the complete waste of time money and effort windmills are. They are not going to make one bit of difference for anyone, apart from those who collect rent for having them on their land. Wind doesnt blow all the time!!!! I'm sure its been mentioned.
  4. So there's no need for so many windmills up here then. If there is already saturation then lets reduce the number.
  5. Police discover cannabis factory then some of the haul gets stolen back!! I would just like to add my support for the £15,000 worth of justice, that has been had over the powers that be.[/url]
  6. What if I were young or old, how old is young, do you mean in the mind or physically speaking? Irrelevant as it is. Point is you are assisting organised crime when you enforce these drug laws. ^^And this somehow makes what they do (or not do) ok?? You avoid the point of the topic. The facts are there. Legalise and control. ^^No I never meant some secret society, if i had meant that i would have said so, I wouldn't be afraid to chat about secret societies. Your tone implies that believing that secret societies exist is somehow amusing. They do exist and its well known in Shetland that a good handshake can go along way. (secret society or a society with secrets bandi how you wish) "society in general" you say. I specified Society legally speaking. such as your law society which its assumed in court that we all stand under. I'm not a part of this society you speak of. What’s its name? I can't remember signing up to that. Create a lawful one and i'll jump on that band wagon.
  7. Not my society by any means. If you cannot name your society then you are not part of it. I am quite happy not to be able to name any society that I am in any way involved or apart of. Legally speaking of course. You take it correctly; I am active in, unfortunately the only avenue available, the letter writing in support of change for the better. It’s just a shame that your society see fit to pursue a course of action which is so evidently wrong. Your lack of opinion and non-response to the subject matter only goes to show how deeply flawed the system is from the core. You are in a position of ability to change the system from within and not just go with grain. Stats and Promotions mean more than what is right. My utter contempt for such Corporations is indescribable. You might not be on the street, you might be CID and spend most of your time dealing with the apprehension of paedophile rings but no matter where you are in the your system, you hold power over peoples’ lives and common sense (I pray) must prevail.
  8. I do hope Sherlock is doing his best to inform his local council and upward of the benefits to the ability to police properly, should the legalisation of drugs take place. I'm sure he will no doubt say something to the effect of "I am none partisan, my job is to carry out the requirements of legal statutes no matter how detrimental they are to the society I am helping to destroy, ahem!! I mean to protect and that is all I am obligated under my oath to do. hypathetically speaking". I dont think the powers that be want the problem to end, far to much money in private prisons and laundering the money for them to just cut off a steady supply of profit.
  9. Wheres my Panda? Did the panda make it up here? http://www.shetland-news.co.uk/2011/March/news/Lets%20switch%20off%20the%20lights.htm
  10. Would this be a reason to halt Council Tax payments, or at least take a portion off it? I've been in that situation a few times, relying on bottled water for everything but you don't expect that on dry land.
  11. Just found this video of a proposed border weapon. http://www.reuters.com/news/video/story?videoId=187406842&videoChannel=2602
  12. The cruelty that comes with the Climate Change Religion. It's so evident with my own child, the conditioning that's going on in his school. An example of the madness which probably isn't so uncommon: http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/quebec-boy-punished-bringing-eco-unfriendly-ziploc-sandwich-bag-school/story?id=12815697
  13. Got a phone call from some IT services guy. Talking about a virus problem which is predominantly rife in Shetland. I wasn't too forthcoming with info as I thought it was a scam call and hadn't heard about it. I told him I had Linux then he just hung up without telling me any more. My own fault for being so cautious. Anyone able to enlighten? (***Mod Edit - Merged with a couple of similar threads and changed the topic to make it more generic***)
  14. Fractional Reserve Banking doing what it does best.
  15. Maybe I am wrong, but is this not an attempt to use a vehicle, without tax, and NOT end up in court? Its him giving Lawful Notice of his intentions to everyone so as too remain in honour if/when he goes to court. He is stating that he wishes to abide by common law (which we all should) and that he does not consent to being ruled by Statutory Law which requires consent for it to be implemented. As I am sure you are aware, the Public Notices section is used to lawfully make others aware of your intentions. If you or I disagree with those intentions, we can rebut and then follow with a claim to counter. Thats my take on it anyway.
  16. Yet another mistake which was allowed to go ahead and influence international policy!! I'm fed up of this crap science being used as proof to create laws that increase the cost of living. Rollocks ! http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-climate-significant-error-experts.html
  17. Amsterdam and Portugal - Heroin problems on the decline. Now we just need the Barsteward MP's to grow a set and follow suit instead of bending over for the bankers and letting them launder the proceeds from the worlds misery. http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2011/01/harm_reduction
  18. AT just wonderin what you thought of this article? Does it not worry you that the "evidence" you use has been admitted to be incredibly flawed?
  19. NASA admit previous climate models were seriously flawed Plenty of Time guys. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/08/new_model_doubled_co2_sub_2_degrees_warming/[/url
  20. My last post was a bit rushed. What I should have said was. The Sovereign Nation of Forvik has nothing to do with the Sovereign Nation of Shetland. Two separate Nations.
  21. If that is the case why is he still seeking donations for this cause via his website? It is obvious that he does in fact hold a place of leadership, unless you are saying he has started the ball rolling and has now backed off and has handed Forewick over to the "New" leaders. One of the original reasons given for starting this whole thing going was the "Lies" and "Non information" from the UK government. There have been questions raised by Shetlinkers about where the funds raised for the cause have and are being spent, who is who and what the state of play is. Why not start as you mean to go on and answer these questions ? I wont hold my breath waiting though! The Sovereignty of Forvik has nothing to do with the Sovereign Shetland movement. Sovereign Shetland may have come out of it but Stuarts own personal sovereignty is his business. If you want answers with regard to Stuarts goings on, message him. A great example of how Sovereignty has been used/preserved is on this website http://www.umatilla.nsn.us/decsov.html
  22. If that is the case why is he still seeking donations for this cause via his website? It is obvious that he does in fact hold a place of leadership, unless you are saying he has started the ball rolling and has now backed off and has handed Forewick over to the "New" leaders. One of the original reasons given for starting this whole thing going was the "Lies" and "Non information" from the UK government. There have been questions raised by Shetlinkers about where the funds raised for the cause have and are being spent, who is who and what the state of play is. Why not start as you mean to go on and answer these questions ? I wont hold my breath waiting though! I'll try and get the answer(s) to that one ASAP. As for the tax status, i'm not sure. Will find out and answer tonight. As for cheating the present government, not the case. They haven't proven authority so no cheating on his part.
  23. I think a better way forward would be for everyone to put forward their questions in a 1,2,3... format and we will try and give as much meaningful and useful information as possible. In the meantime I will try and get access to the website to update as much as possible.
  24. Hopefully this "movement" has begun its final journey straight down the u-bend of the nearest toilet, where it belongs. I hope Stuart has the sence to realise that he is flogging a dead horse here and move on. Why would you say that? Do you think all is great at the moment? Don't you think we have the right to be free of this oppressive dictatorship we live under and start a fresh system which has fairness and equality at the heart of it? Anyone who believes the elections will make a blind bit of difference is clearly in need of specialist help. The older generations that I have spoken to have confirmed that for their whole lives, the system has been broken. Its never worked and the odds are, it never will. Yet we get new "leaders" in every couple of years that claim they can and want to solve the problem. They change nothing, repeal none of the pathetic petty "laws" the previous government enacted and continue to add new ones. The E.U. dictate policy and our councils, government are helpless. Our so-called representatives are given 90seconds to speak about whatever issues they have within their constituency and are then cut off with no follow up or debate. We have a possibility to change things for the better and it seems no-one bar a few are willing or wanting to do anything about it. Forget that you've heard Stuart is involved. He is just another individual interested in being free of the Governmental restraints. He holds no leadership position and has no want to. To get this off the ground is not going to be easy, I admit there hasn't been enough information put out with regard to Sovereignty and that alone is going to make people dubious. I will try my hardest to get as much useful information posted as possible.
×
×
  • Create New...