Jump to content

peeriesooky

Members
  • Posts

    308
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • MSN
    peerieprincess@hotmail.co
  • Website URL
    http://
  1. http://www.comcastic.com/?gotoSection=culture_fool Mr T at his finest
  2. can we not jist get shetland tae claim its independance and mak it a bone fide pirate haven then it cud be compulsary for folk tae dress in pirate clobber (technically viking get up qualifies too) and have a merry old singsong da moment dere's mair as wan person aroond etc
  3. Bloody hell. Now you are posting crap about the way Sakchai walks! Just wait til next week folks, Peeriesooky will give in depth analysis on how Sakchai eats his lunch, how he walks upstairs in an unconventional "2 steps at a time" manner and the haphazard manner in which he loads his washing machine. and it wis vailron dat posted a comment on how sakchaio walks, no me, i wis merely answering tae it and trying to come up wi possible reasons fir folk haeing a different opinion on it. it wis ok for ithers to reply to vailron's post Nah, I had a bitch at Vailron as well. Don't worry, I'm not singling you out. that's a'right then wid hate it if we had tae have an anti ministry of silly walks type thing where folk hae tae be taught on da national curriculum the accepted manner of walking. some folk what da way dey do due tae medical conditions such as being flat footed, hyper mobile. how somewan walks isna really a reasonable reason tae complain. i wis jist trying tae understand why vailron wis complaining aboot it, but i dinna agree wi his point. likewise, sakchai has thanked folk fir their help and support on numerous mediums (papers, tv etc) do we need tae hae yet anither rally or sumthing jist fir him tae say thank you, or can we no jist leave him be and get on wi things noo (at least whaar he is concerned onyway) efter aa, he said himself that he wants aathing to go back to normal again. let this whole affair blow over for him, but keep da political ripples it has caused continue and gather mair steam (mcphail)
  4. Bloody hell. Now you are posting crap about the way Sakchai walks! Just wait til next week folks, Peeriesooky will give in depth analysis on how Sakchai eats his lunch, how he walks upstairs in an unconventional "2 steps at a time" manner and the haphazard manner in which he loads his washing machine. and it wis vailron dat posted a comment on how sakchaio walks, no me, i wis merely answering tae it and trying to come up wi possible reasons fir folk haeing a different opinion on it. it wis ok for ithers to reply to vailron's post
  5. and whit exactly is there to be jealous or obsessed off??? the psychophants on here may well be the wans who are obsessed wi him
  6. the folk dat seem tae keep dragging these threads down are those dat are maist vocal about folk doing dat. if sumwan expresses an opinion they hae to pull da piss or whitever rather as jist accept sumwans opinion grow up
  7. and so whit if dey do, they're opinion
  8. if any of u were capable of actually reading tho, i never criticised his walk mysel, but tried to put reasons as tae why folk may have a problem wi it. ur far too quick tae jump on onywan that mite be unfairly criticising sumwan by doing just dat urselfs. get off dis high and mighty opinion of urselfs and stop wi da personal attacks. just accept a difference of opinion and leave it at dat i couldna care less aboot whit sakchai does, it has nothing to dae wi me, he can walk whitever way he wants to walk, i'm no bothered. it was simply conjecture
  9. but at da same time it cud jist come doon to a difference of opinion, what mite appear as an arrogant swagger to wan person, mite no to anither. it doesn't hae tae neccesarily be soor grapes, but simply a different viewpoint of cultural tastes etc. sakchai does often walk with that crappy pseudo gangster type walk/strut/swagger, whitever u wanna call it. but plenty of ither young folk walk da same way. there isna neccessarily onything in it, it's just how he walks. or it mite be more, waa really kens? it's all supposition. likewise, sumwan fae an older generation may look unfavourably at dis walk as an arrogant swagger, whereas sumwan fae a younger generation will probably be oblivious to it as it's part of da youth culture nooadays.
  10. This is the "News" thread Vailron. Bitter rants should probably be posted elsewhere. but then, da "debate" thread etc has been locked, so whaar else wis he supposed tae post? Look at the top left of the column of posts peeriesookie. You'll see a very pretty button with the words "New Topic" emblazoned on it. This button is intended for people who have valid grounds for discussion to use when they want to start said discussion. If anyone has got a point to make, try using it, rather than burying snide comments in this thread. Stop whinging. but at da same point, if he had opened a new thread it probably wid o bin locked just as quick wi da immortal wirds "nae good can come of this" either way, Brian says dat da "debate" thread has been reopened so dat's where dat stuff belongs (if it doesn't spiral oot of control as has so often happened)
  11. loved that book, tho i did find myself wondering whit it said aboot me dat i liked it so much as u surely shudna 'enjoy' reading aboot da gruesome ways in which he kills folk etc, but u kinda do also, me and my sister also started wondering aboot how bret easton ellis wis able to write in such detail aboot da killing methodology etc as it almost sounded too realistic (had he actually done these things???? efter aa, he used tae work in an office etc in a role very like patrick bateman)
  12. This is the "News" thread Vailron. Bitter rants should probably be posted elsewhere. but then, da "debate" thread etc has been locked, so whaar else wis he supposed tae post?
  13. I'm glad you don't write for the paper! and I'd be happier if she didna either...so whit's dy point? I dinna and didna say i could do a better job. but dat disna mean dat her's is ony good. it's a personal preference. but then I also think da shetland times is awful onyway
  14. a fine posy DavieG, but along wi da hale idea o clarifying things, could i clarify dat at nae point did i state dat u, da campaign team or sakchai himself made excuses for his past mistakes. my issue wis wi da press dat had tried making excuses fir his behaviour when der wis nae need to. Indeed, I often pointed oot dat his behaviour should be commended in how he didna mak ony excuses, but simply pointed oot dat he had done his time etc. da problem on dis thread has often not been whit folk have posted, but how folk have taken it (often wioot actually reading all dat is there, or merely looking at points o da post as opposed tae da hale thing). by only taking dis wan segment oot o dy post, it suddenly takes on a completely different meaning, as it is noo completely oot o context, and wid appear dat excuses have bin made, when dey havna bin. dis has bin happening an affy lot on here, and dis has bin da problem. often, entire posts are not inflammatory/offensive, but take oot wan piece oot o context and suddenly it appears dat way. understandably, tempers and emotions have bin high. but dis coold also hae clouded sum folks judgment of folks post and their actual intentions. no mony folk have covered demsel's in glory on dis thread, including those taking da moral high ground against ithers. baith 'sides' o da 'debate' havna exactly bin covering demsel's in much glory wi how dis thread has gone
×
×
  • Create New...