Jump to content

peeriesooky

Members
  • Posts

    308
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by peeriesooky

  1. can we not jist get shetland tae claim its independance and mak it a bone fide pirate haven :D

     

    then it cud be compulsary for folk tae dress in pirate clobber (technically viking get up qualifies too) and have a merry old singsong da moment dere's mair as wan person aroond etc :lol:

  2. but at da same time it cud jist come doon to a difference of opinion, what mite appear as an arrogant swagger to wan person, mite no to anither.

     

    it doesn't hae tae neccesarily be soor grapes, but simply a different viewpoint of cultural tastes etc. sakchai does often walk with that crappy pseudo gangster type walk/strut/swagger, whitever u wanna call it. but plenty of ither young folk walk da same way. there isna neccessarily onything in it, it's just how he walks. or it mite be more, waa really kens? it's all supposition.

    likewise, sumwan fae an older generation may look unfavourably at dis walk as an arrogant swagger, whereas sumwan fae a younger generation will probably be oblivious to it as it's part of da youth culture nooadays.

     

    Bloody hell.

     

    Now you are posting crap about the way Sakchai walks!

     

    Just wait til next week folks, Peeriesooky will give in depth analysis on how Sakchai eats his lunch, how he walks upstairs in an unconventional "2 steps at a time" manner and the haphazard manner in which he loads his washing machine.

     

    :roll:

     

    and it wis vailron dat posted a comment on how sakchaio walks, no me, i wis merely answering tae it and trying to come up wi possible reasons fir folk haeing a different opinion on it.

     

    it wis ok for ithers to reply to vailron's post :roll:

     

    Nah, I had a bitch at Vailron as well. Don't worry, I'm not singling you out.

     

    that's a'right then :)

     

    wid hate it if we had tae have an anti ministry of silly walks type thing where folk hae tae be taught on da national curriculum the accepted manner of walking.

    some folk what da way dey do due tae medical conditions such as being flat footed, hyper mobile. how somewan walks isna really a reasonable reason tae complain.

    i wis jist trying tae understand why vailron wis complaining aboot it, but i dinna agree wi his point.

    likewise, sakchai has thanked folk fir their help and support on numerous mediums (papers, tv etc) do we need tae hae yet anither rally or sumthing jist fir him tae say thank you, or can we no jist leave him be and get on wi things noo (at least whaar he is concerned onyway) efter aa, he said himself that he wants aathing to go back to normal again. let this whole affair blow over for him, but keep da political ripples it has caused continue and gather mair steam (mcphail) :lol:

  3. but at da same time it cud jist come doon to a difference of opinion, what mite appear as an arrogant swagger to wan person, mite no to anither.

     

    it doesn't hae tae neccesarily be soor grapes, but simply a different viewpoint of cultural tastes etc. sakchai does often walk with that crappy pseudo gangster type walk/strut/swagger, whitever u wanna call it. but plenty of ither young folk walk da same way. there isna neccessarily onything in it, it's just how he walks. or it mite be more, waa really kens? it's all supposition.

    likewise, sumwan fae an older generation may look unfavourably at dis walk as an arrogant swagger, whereas sumwan fae a younger generation will probably be oblivious to it as it's part of da youth culture nooadays.

     

    Bloody hell.

     

    Now you are posting crap about the way Sakchai walks!

     

    Just wait til next week folks, Peeriesooky will give in depth analysis on how Sakchai eats his lunch, how he walks upstairs in an unconventional "2 steps at a time" manner and the haphazard manner in which he loads his washing machine.

     

    :roll:

     

    and it wis vailron dat posted a comment on how sakchaio walks, no me, i wis merely answering tae it and trying to come up wi possible reasons fir folk haeing a different opinion on it.

     

    it wis ok for ithers to reply to vailron's post :roll:

  4. He'll set up the Sakchai-Neighbourhood-Strut-Watch.

     

    Maybe the Sakchai critics are just jealous or obsessed with him.

     

    They have to remember that he didn't bring this on himself.

     

    and whit exactly is there to be jealous or obsessed off???

     

    the psychophants on here may well be the wans who are obsessed wi him :roll:

  5. if any of u were capable of actually reading tho, i never criticised his walk mysel, but tried to put reasons as tae why folk may have a problem wi it.

     

    ur far too quick tae jump on onywan that mite be unfairly criticising sumwan by doing just dat urselfs.

     

    get off dis high and mighty opinion of urselfs and stop wi da personal attacks. just accept a difference of opinion and leave it at dat

     

    i couldna care less aboot whit sakchai does, it has nothing to dae wi me, he can walk whitever way he wants to walk, i'm no bothered. it was simply conjecture

  6. but at da same time it cud jist come doon to a difference of opinion, what mite appear as an arrogant swagger to wan person, mite no to anither.

     

    it doesn't hae tae neccesarily be soor grapes, but simply a different viewpoint of cultural tastes etc. sakchai does often walk with that crappy pseudo gangster type walk/strut/swagger, whitever u wanna call it. but plenty of ither young folk walk da same way. there isna neccessarily onything in it, it's just how he walks. or it mite be more, waa really kens? it's all supposition.

    likewise, sumwan fae an older generation may look unfavourably at dis walk as an arrogant swagger, whereas sumwan fae a younger generation will probably be oblivious to it as it's part of da youth culture nooadays.

  7. i have not seen a public thank you from sackchai yet, a post here would be nice, or an open letter to the shetland times thanking everyone for their support. especialy now tha the swans around like he owns the place

     

    This is the "News" thread Vailron.

     

    Bitter rants should probably be posted elsewhere.

     

    but then, da "debate" thread etc has been locked, so whaar else wis he supposed tae post?

     

    Look at the top left of the column of posts peeriesookie.

    You'll see a very pretty button with the words "New Topic" emblazoned on it.

     

    This button is intended for people who have valid grounds for discussion to use when they want to start said discussion.

     

    If anyone has got a point to make, try using it, rather than burying snide comments in this thread.

     

    Stop whinging.

     

    but at da same point, if he had opened a new thread it probably wid o bin locked just as quick wi da immortal wirds "nae good can come of this" :wink:

     

    either way, Brian says dat da "debate" thread has been reopened so dat's where dat stuff belongs (if it doesn't spiral oot of control as has so often happened)

  8. I am reading American Phyco by Bret Easton Ellis really great read but find myslef looking at people that annoy me in a very strange way 8O if you have seen the film forget all about it the book is way better and more happens in it!!

     

    Another really good book to read is The courious incident of the dog in the night time by Mark Haddon.

     

    :D :D

     

    loved that book, tho i did find myself wondering whit it said aboot me dat i liked it so much as u surely shudna 'enjoy' reading aboot da gruesome ways in which he kills folk etc, but u kinda do :wink:

     

    also, me and my sister also started wondering aboot how bret easton ellis wis able to write in such detail aboot da killing methodology etc as it almost sounded too realistic (had he actually done these things???? efter aa, he used tae work in an office etc in a role very like patrick bateman) :wink: :D :lol:

  9. i have not seen a public thank you from sackchai yet, a post here would be nice, or an open letter to the shetland times thanking everyone for their support. especialy now tha the swans around like he owns the place

     

    This is the "News" thread Vailron.

     

    Bitter rants should probably be posted elsewhere.

     

    but then, da "debate" thread etc has been locked, so whaar else wis he supposed tae post?

  10. i jist think her written style is so awful and bland, and it comes across, tae me onyway, lik its mair look whaar i am as opposed tae being informative

     

    da idea o it isna sae bad, if it wis wriiten by sumwan dat cud actually write

    I'm glad you don't write for the paper!

     

    and I'd be happier if she didna either...so whit's dy point?

     

    I dinna and didna say i could do a better job. but dat disna mean dat her's is ony good.

     

    it's a personal preference.

     

    but then I also think da shetland times is awful onyway :wink:

  11. a fine posy DavieG, but along wi da hale idea o clarifying things, could i clarify dat at nae point did i state dat u, da campaign team or sakchai himself made excuses for his past mistakes. my issue wis wi da press dat had tried making excuses fir his behaviour when der wis nae need to.

     

    Indeed, I often pointed oot dat his behaviour should be commended in how he didna mak ony excuses, but simply pointed oot dat he had done his time etc.

     

    da problem on dis thread has often not been whit folk have posted, but how folk have taken it (often wioot actually reading all dat is there, or merely looking at points o da post as opposed tae da hale thing).

     

    the Shetland for Sakchai team use any of the detailed 'excuses' for Sakchai's behaviour that were highlighted in the thread.

     

    by only taking dis wan segment oot o dy post, it suddenly takes on a completely different meaning, as it is noo completely oot o context, and wid appear dat excuses have bin made, when dey havna bin. dis has bin happening an affy lot on here, and dis has bin da problem.

     

    often, entire posts are not inflammatory/offensive, but take oot wan piece oot o context and suddenly it appears dat way.

     

    understandably, tempers and emotions have bin high. but dis coold also hae clouded sum folks judgment of folks post and their actual intentions. no mony folk have covered demsel's in glory on dis thread, including those taking da moral high ground against ithers. baith 'sides' o da 'debate' havna exactly bin covering demsel's in much glory wi how dis thread has gone :roll:

  12. out at da street da ither day, and along wi a ganfg of kids standing bloking da street right across fae da stage door to rae's jot moving for onywan (not even folk wi buggies) instead jumping around rite in deir faces etc. Add tae dis da fact dat wan o dem at set fire tae da bin ootside da hydro by putting a lit fag in it. Is dis still merely teenage high jinx, or do we actually accept dat, yes, it might no be as bad as da inner city areas of glasgow or even aberdeen, but do we have tae wait til it dus get dat bad? would it no be better tae teach da kids respect fir ithers etc noo, rather than wait til they've mugged/attacked sumwan as this is a serious enough act tae deal wi?

     

    Nonsense. onything dat disrupts da lives o ithers, even if it is jist playing footy in a crowded area like da street or flinging fancies in shop doors is at da very least a breach, and deserves at da very least a stern talking to and warning o future behaviour by da polis. Do we want tae continue turning a blind eye to "minor" acts, thus encouraging da potential o mair serious acts later?

  13. Like the one's fae when you were younger :wink:

     

    Its happy pop stuff, verging on 'power pop' at times. The production and songwriting are flawless. It could be compared to Brian Wilson's work with the Beach Boys at times.

     

    Green Gartside's voice has matured a lot (I always thought it sounded a bit thin) and he's cheered up a bit from the 80s.

     

     

     

    McFly, you'd like it

     

    cheers, I'll hae tae gi it a go :wink:

     

    also hae tae dig oot my old scritti politti collection (no quite sure it merits da collection tag, but hey ho :) )

  14. exactly my point tomblands, thank you :wink:

     

    It widn't hae changed my view either, as da main issue wis dat he had done his time, so da way it had originally been reported in da press wis unneccessary. Sakchai wisna making excuses fir his actions so why wir dey?

     

    As you say, dis may hae resulted in a negative reaction fae sum folk so why tak da risk, tho it could jist hae bin a case o da info being relayed or taken wrang :)

     

    As i have mentioned previously (as have mony ithers) da acceptance o his "moment of madness" by sakchai is to be commended, making nae excuses, and surely it is dis attitude dat has won folk ower :)

  15. no bereavements have bin discussed. aabody is making a fuss ower nithing. da point wis excuses being made fir sumthing when dey wir irrelevant due tae happening efter da event. da only folk banging on aboot bereavements are those dat are missing da point. no matter whit it wis dat wis said, onything dat happened efter he committed his crime should no have bin used as an excuse fir his actions - whether intentional or no.

    it jist seems tae be da case dat u canna say onything withoot folk taking offence fir da sake o taking offence.

    da only mention i made o da bereavements were fae a quote by sakchai stating dat da events happened efter his "moment of madness". it wis aabody else dat kept going on aboot dem, missing da point entirely.

    why make excuses when he had paid his dues, and why use events dat happened efter da incident, regardless o whit dey wir?

    I never said whaa started mentioning it, or whaa put it aboot, simply dat it has been in a number of press articles etc when it shouldna hae been.

    if folk could be less reactionary and simply read whit has bin written things widna get so oot o hand on here.

    folk keep going on aboot how sakchai's jist a young lad dat made a mistake etc. well, fine, but he isna a protected species either.

    stop taking offence jist coz somebody disna like sumthing or whitever and keep things simple.

    Having experienced miscarriages, deaths etc, I wis disgusted by da use o dis sort o thing to excuse his actions. I ken dat sakchai wisna responsible fir dis, as he has made nae attempt tae excuse his actions (a commendable attitude), but da fact is dat somebody did, whaaever it wis, and dat leaves me cold at da callousness o it.

    I am entitled tae feel dat way, and if u dinna agree and dinna want it discussed etc, den dinna respond. I wis making a point o how i felt aboot it, i didna want a big discussion aa aboot it.

     

    But it is interesting tae note dat when i asked aboot how da appeal process works, naaboady could answer. Post this, and aabody comes oot o da woodwork again tae bang on aboot how bad it is tae hae a go at sakchai (which wis never done)

    :roll: :roll: :roll:

  16. taken fae da censorship thread

     

    Link us to a story regarding the matter in question and we can start discussing it. I started the Gary Marshall thread on the morning his story was on the Shetland News, therefore the story was seen as being "in the public domain".

     

    you canna hae it baith ways. If these issues were too sensitive, dey should never hae bin mentioned in da press in da 1st place.

×
×
  • Create New...