Jump to content

Military intervention in Syria  

57 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the UK take military action against the Syrian regime

    • Yes
      9
    • No
      36
    • Undecided
      9


Recommended Posts

So there is a bottle neck , they are safe where they are so there is absolutely no need trash these points just ungrateful and greedy and they are not all fleeing immediate war zone. Turkey ,Serbia and Hungary are not warzones no excuses.

 

We as rational outsiders watching from our comfortable homes can see they are safe there. Clearly they are not all that comfortable. People don't take life-threatening journeys like many of these people have, just because they fancy somewhere slightly wealthier than where they are. The conditions in Turkey, Serbia and Hungary are a huge improvement on where they have come from, and yes - those places are not warzones - but they are still in a desperate situation. Supplies in these camps are limited, medical resources are stretched and clearly conditions are not hunky dory. People are acting as they are out of complete desperation, and to sit back and judge them as "ungrateful and greedy", to me, shows a complete lack of compassion and understanding. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not question someone had to say it, we are now beginning see the bigger picture and it's full implications for the UK.

This has been the tone of the coverage almost the entire time. We had a brief change in tone following following the deaths of dozens of people in a truck in Austria, and the publication of images of the Kurdi family, but before that we were being told of the "swarms" approaching Europe, the various social problems, the terrible burdern it would be for us... We briefly had news coverage that treated these people like humans, but we're quickly reverting back to talking about them as "savages", or uncouth thugs with nothing in their heads but rude self-mindedness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If you watch this video(4.35) it shows how many of the immigrants have the latest mobile phones and use them to pass on the latest tips and information about the best routes to take.

 

 

Yes it's very immoral of them to upgrade their phones before fleeing for their lives.

 

Disgusting, isn't it? Us Brits would have the good manners to leave all our personal belongings behind when fleeing a warzone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If you watch this video(4.35) it shows how many of the immigrants have the latest mobile phones and use them to pass on the latest tips and information about the best routes to take.

 

 

Yes it's very immoral of them to upgrade their phones before fleeing for their lives.

 

 

But fine for them to leave their wives and family behind then?

 

The majority of those who have got out are those who could afford to pay; there's millions of others stuck there in the midst of the civil war who can't.  Guess who I have the most sympathy for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously only those with money can afford to pay the exorbitant people smuggler fees.

Up to date mobile communication can also be a valuable survival tool to keep in touch with whats happening as well as GPS etc.

The "back to middle ages" terrorist types usually to try to wipe out the educated and middle classes first as  they don't fall for their guff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If you watch this video(4.35) it shows how many of the immigrants have the latest mobile phones and use them to pass on the latest tips and information about the best routes to take.

Yes it's very immoral of them to upgrade their phones before fleeing for their lives.

 

Erm, that sounds like a contradiction.

 

If you were actually fleeing for your life then surely the last thing that would be on your mind is "upgrading" your mobile phone.

 

And anyway, the attitude and behaviour of many is leaving a lot to be desired.

 

So much for showing some respect towards the people you're expecting to help you.....

 

The problem with what's happening here is, yes, they might be leaving trouble countries but they're not content with arriving on the first safe shore and staying there - they're leaving their own countries and when they've crossed the various stretches of sea they're making a beeline for other specifc European countries which they regard as a lands of milk and honey.

 

For me, this brings into question their motives for leaving.

Edited by Kavi Ugl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.shetnews.co.uk/news/11418-isles-consider-response-to-refugee-crisis

 

Just who are "The Shetland Partnership Board" ? Anybody know?

 

"Boden pointed out that the UK government was indicating it might help pay to refurbish accommodation for refugees."

 

Yeah, like the "indicated" that they would pay for the Oil Industry housing....  We fell for it then, will we fall for it again?

 

"However distribution based on the size of councils would see us receive only half a refugee,” 

 

Hooray, the great man has spoken and, as usual, put his foot into his mouth.

 

Does anyone else think that "half a refugee" is a bit extreme?  Instead of a half, couldn't we just ask for a little one... :rofl:

"Shetland Supports Refugees", "Shetland Solidarity with Refugees".  Any other "pythonesque" groups out there?

 

The point behind all this guff is that no one has yet seen fit to ask the public how we should respond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...