Jump to content

Jarlshof


peeriebryan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I didn't know the site was named Jarlshof by Sir Walter Scott......

 

Many of the older generations (now all deceased) loathed the name Jarlshof, and steadfastly refused to use it, preferring simpy to refer to it as "Da Paechts".

 

As far as I could ascertain their resentment of the name stemmed from two main sources, the fact it was created by a short term visitor who neither had in depth knowledge of the site or the area, rather than a resident who did, and that it had obvious Viking connotations. Their feeling was that the name should have reflected either the founders of the site, or been descriptive of the overall nature of the site, choosing a name which really only reflected one grouping that had occupied the site, was to them rather disrespectful to the other groups which had also occupied it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't recall any alternative being spoken of, but someone a bit older or with more knowledge of the site may well remember better. I just recall how the 60+ year old generation reacted to the name when I was growing up, and as I had a relative who sometimes did part time seasonal work on the site (and he even refused to refer to it as Jarlshof), it was a subject that came up on a semi regular basis.

 

I stand corrected if I'm wrong in this, but I got the impression that the excavated site was never "officially" named as Jarlshof, it was just one of those names that someone started using to refer to it, and it caught on with increasing numbers of people over time. I don't think it would be wise to change it now, the knowledge and reputation of the site is far too widely known for a name change to do anything much unless confuse people, and harm it's popularity. I don't think there can be many people who object to it today, it was mainly a thing of the adult generations of the day when the excavations were undertaken and the name grew in popularity.

 

That's a good article on the Scotsman's site though, a considerable amount of information in a relatively short passage, much of which is not often heard or widely known, even locally. I enjoyed reading it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Has there been ony alternative names suggested? Its probably a bit late to change it now though

 

No more chance of changing that as there is of Up Helly Aa being scrapped

 

well ya never know stranger things have happened... 8O :roll: :idea:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has there been ony alternative names suggested? Its probably a bit late to change it now though

 

No more chance of changing that as there is of Up Helly Aa being scrapped

 

OMG Non identity has arrouse from the depths :shock: :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG Non identity has arrouse from the depths :shock: :P

 

Eh? I don't get that.

 

To clarify my point there, Jarlshof has become an 'international' label in keeping with U-H-A and our shameless 'viking' promotion, even though the Vikings came here and didn't originate here. It is ironic that Jarlshof has been tarred historically with the same brush, though the vast majority of the archaeology present there is non-viking. A bit like 'Maes Howe' being titled after one of the vikings who scrawled their names on the internal walls, thousands of years after it was built.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Non Identity was a username from the SIC website - quite an articulate poster if I might be so bold.

 

They were female though Twerto were they not? Or so I was led to believe.

 

I can safely vouch for Njugles man-ness - if there is such a phrase!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think most people are in agreement that although Jarlshof is perhaps not the best name for the place, it will never change due to it being a large tourist attraction for Shetland. What surprises me more than anything is why folk 'back in the day' never reclaimed the majority of stone there to use for dyke building and so on. This also poses the question as to where the majority of stone came from for dykes in the past. Is it possible that many other 'sites of interest' were taken apart to provide farming boundaries? In my opinion this was almost a normal practise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This also poses the question as to where the majority of stone came from for dykes in the past. Is it possible that many other 'sites of interest' were taken apart to provide farming boundaries? In my opinion this was almost a normal practise.

 

You're quite right there. There are many places in shetland called brough. All named after a broch which stood there. I'm thinking of brough in Whalsay in particular where there is no sign of the broch now. All the stone was used to build the houses which are there now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Non Identity was a username from the SIC website - quite an articulate poster if I might be so bold.

 

They were female though Twerto were they not? Or so I was led to believe.

 

I can safely vouch for Njugles man-ness - if there is such a phrase!?

 

He played out being a female, but it turned out to be a man from what I heard.. i was told who it was, as it turned out to be a friend or acquaintance on harry V, but alas my memory let me forget as the name didn't mean anything to me.

 

but yes very articulate, with well ( sometimes overly ) thought out replies and was always good for a good debate, even if it was in the role of the devils advocate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Yeah, the audio tour is pretty good; I went along to the Historic Scotland free weekend at the beginning of April. The nifty thing is that you can choose how much information you want on each bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...