peeriesooky Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 1. You agree, through your use of the Shetlink forums, that you will not post (or hyperlink to) any material or use language which is defamatory, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, inciting of violence, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or in violation of ANY UK law. Personal attacks, inflammatory posts, harrassment, impersonation and trolling will not be tolerated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plucker Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 Maybe you could learn from this little episode. Though I suspect not!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peeriesooky Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 roll di eyes all du wants, dat wis totally uncalled for, unjustified, and served nae purpose ither than tae try and stir trouble. if da term troll gets bandied aboot, den i think it is well fitting of you efter dat stunt plucker. i will learn nithing, as i had nithing tae learn. but perhaps du shud be thinking o di ain actions. dat "episode" wis a disgrace now leave it be and get on wi whit du claims tae be helping Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peeriesooky Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 when wis da last time onyboady mentioned sakchai on dis thread rather as haeing a go at ain anither? hows preperations gan fir next week for example? mair relevant dan personal attacks and nitpicking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njugle Posted June 30, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 "Plucker" check your private messages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trout Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 Well spank my monkey! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derick Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 As a break from e-mailing the Great and the Good (go on, try it, it's great exercise for the fingers) here is a suggestion for actual debate, this being a DEBATE thread. Do you think that the Sir Humphreys at the Home Office have deliberately picked on Sakchai as a 'so ridiculous it is guaranteed to fail' case? Then the whole stupid policy may be amended for the better? That's the conspiracy line. or are they really this mind-bogglingly incompent? That's the boy-hen-willie-up line? whacha think folks? PS the 'I was bullied into signing by a little kid' (somewhere, don't know where,don't know when)' line of recent days, could easily be mistaken for a clumsy smear. tsk tsk. then again maybe Vailron is a bit of a girly-girly-woos-woos! PPS - Maybe the moderators should start a new 'Trolls' thread, where certain parties can rabbit on to themselves ad nauseum without making everybody else ill?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peeriesooky Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 Do you think that the Sir Humphreys at the Home Office have deliberately picked on Sakchai as a 'so ridiculous it is guaranteed to fail' case? Then the whole stupid policy may be amended for the better? That's the conspiracy line. unfortunately, doot da campaign is dat lucky, though it is an interesting thought, and as wi all conspiracies, du jist never kens Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 As a break from e-mailing the Great and the Good (go on, try it, it's great exercise for the fingers) here is a suggestion for actual debate, this being a DEBATE thread. Do you think that the Sir Humphreys at the Home Office have deliberately picked on Sakchai as a 'so ridiculous it is guaranteed to fail' case? Then the whole stupid policy may be amended for the better? That's the conspiracy line. or are they really this mind-bogglingly incompent? That's the boy-hen-willie-up line? whacha think folks? PS the 'I was bullied into signing by a little kid' (somewhere, don't know where,don't know when)' line of recent days, could easily be mistaken for a clumsy smear. tsk tsk. then again maybe Vailron is a bit of a girly-girly-woos-woos! PPS - Maybe the moderators should start a new 'Trolls' thread, where certain parties can rabbit on to themselves ad nauseum without making everybody else ill?? id be suprised if they actualy knew where shetland was! i'd think that everyone that has been picked up are only names on a data base Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peeriewife Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 PS the 'I was bullied into signing by a little kid' (somewhere, don't know where,don't know when)' line of recent days, could easily be mistaken for a clumsy smear. tsk tsk. then again maybe Vailron is a bit of a girly-girly-woos-woos! PPS - Maybe the moderators should start a new 'Trolls' thread, where certain parties can rabbit on to themselves ad nauseum without making everybody else ill?? Was this really required? This needs to get back on track and stick to the points of helping sakchai. None of this is helping him at all. This has gone all over the place. people will always have different view. Thats life. For example I do not agree that Davie should have posted his post about sam on the public forum and i think it was handled badly and things have gone a bit awol since, I do think Sakchai was not treated right in how they went about it and i dont want anything negative to happen to him as i am not against the campaign and i do think people are being childish. There are people on here who have general intrest in this case and who have asked questions ie peeriesooky and sam and have been met by negativity. If we know the answers to questions we should answer them and if we do not know the answer we should find out. It is how we learn. I just wish the debate could begin and we can discuss things in a friendly manner. We dont know each other but that should not mean we can bitch at each other because we do not have to face each other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peeriewife Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 How is the campaign going? do we have any news as to what is happening with Sakchai's case? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njugle Posted June 30, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 Hi peeriewife, the latest news from the campaign is being posted, as it develops over on the "News" thread Click here to read the News thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peeriewife Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 Thank you dear i will go and check it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derick Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 Was this really required? er - no. but I have been e-mailing MPs all night, without so much as a beer, and that makes me grumpy. sorry! Derick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peeriewife Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 thats ok im sure all is forgiven lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.