Ghostrider Posted March 9, 2010 Report Share Posted March 9, 2010 Unless there is a PM resistance movement in operation. Where do we sign up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unlinkedstudent Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Unless there is a PM resistance movement in operation. Where do we sign up. Damn it; we've been rumbled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icepick239 Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Bairns, are you never goin ta let go o it. People are using the Shetlink Forum to fight what they perceive as serious wrongdoing and supreme arrogance against the electorate of Shetland, by some or most of its Elected Members. Anyone who hasn't had a look-in at Shetlink are missing out on some comprehensive and extremely clever comments, by many clever people. Maybe the above is just a peerie chide, but your input to date leaves much to be desired and that's what is so strange?Everyone knows you are capable of much better, but still you continue to mock peoples efforts. So, forever consigned to Brian's illiterate basket it seems. Clever comments? Having read that pile of conceited nonsense I have to say I agree wholeheartedly with Brian. That's fine, well don't you go sitting on your brain too much.By the way, is it raining way down there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
north Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Oddtablet noted; for other peoples money read our money thank you Actually the SIC don't care who's money it is, where it comes from or what they have to do to get it. Grants from Scotland, UK, EU, they take it all and mix it in with a bit of financial magic and, hey presto there is more "free" money! It is all OPM though. Bet you wish you could do that! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bresail Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 I have a very conceited idea that may help us settle this problem.If all of us, every man woman and child, donate around £22.00, for every £500,000 of lost money donated by our council.This would put us in the black.This would then mean that the council could then fund more lost causes.The generousity of our council is legend.Where on earth does this money come from?I suspect that the council all chip in and pay it out of their own pockets.Thank goodness that we help them out and pay them expenses.Who will be the first person to donate?Maybe it will be the people who want us to follow this lead; "Bairns, are you never goin ta let go o it." Get your cheque books out folks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unlinkedstudent Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 I have a very conceited idea that may help us settle this problem.If all of us, every man woman and child, donate around £22.00, for every £500,000 of lost money donated by our council.This would put us in the black.This would then mean that the council could then fund more lost causes.The generousity of our council is legend.Where on earth does this money come from?I suspect that the council all chip in and pay it out of their own pockets.Thank goodness that we help them out and pay them expenses.Who will be the first person to donate?Maybe it will be the people who want us to follow this lead; "Bairns, are you never goin ta let go o it." Get your cheque books out folks. Given that SIC took advice from COSLA and as they are a government body, if the investigation now taking place finds them at fault for the advice they gave, especially given the re-opening of the criminal investigations, then I reckon it should be the government who compensate as a result of COSLA's maladministration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulb Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 if dr wills is correct that the people who lodged the complaint against him did not have permission to spend 3k on legal advice then they should each pay it back. as two of them are solicitors why could they not write it themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smarty Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Paul B must have second sight" poor selection of candidate" something he suggested on page one of this discussion. I think we may have found Dave Cllarks successor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Anonymous Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 did he get the traffic wardens job ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostrider Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 Okay....apart from the fact someone can't spell, this is just taking the f'n urine..... Having ended my venture into permanent public sector employment as Chief Executive of Shetland Islands Council, I am pleased to announce that as of 1st March 2010, dalzell projects is again actively trading. The 'phone has already been ringing and my first assignment back in the world of consultancy takes me back to London next week. I would like to thank Shetland Isalnds Council for the opportunity of being their Chief Executive. I consider it a priviledge, and look forward to seeing the initiatives we began together bear fruit in the years to come. I wish SIC and the community my best wishes for the future. Best regards, Dave Clark Chief Executive - dalzell consulting limited 2nd March 2010 http://www.dalzell.org.uk/index.html Somewhat tellingly perhaps, it seems all of Dalzell's "Associates" with the exception of daddy have done a Houdini..... http://www.dalzell.org.uk/page2.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bug Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 "I would like to thank Shetland Isalnds Council" The man who wrote that guff is either a phoney professional (given that he can't spell island) or it's a Freudian slip (and he's going to invest some of our money in an ISA before the 5th April Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
north Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 I consider it a priviledge, and look forward to seeing the initiatives we began together bear fruit in the years to come I can think of only one good initiative that has been accomplished. Unfortunately it cost 250,000 quid! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohanofNess Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 Okay....apart from the fact someone can't spell, this is just taking the f'n urine..... Having ended my venture into permanent public sector employment as Chief Executive of Shetland Islands Council, I am pleased to announce that as of 1st March 2010, dalzell projects is again actively trading. The 'phone has already been ringing and my first assignment back in the world of consultancy takes me back to London next week. I would like to thank Shetland Isalnds Council for the opportunity of being their Chief Executive. I consider it a priviledge, and look forward to seeing the initiatives we began together bear fruit in the years to come. I wish SIC and the community my best wishes for the future. Best regards, Dave Clark Chief Executive - dalzell consulting limited 2nd March 2010 http://www.dalzell.org.uk/index.html Somewhat tellingly perhaps, it seems all of Dalzell's "Associates" with the exception of daddy have done a Houdini..... http://www.dalzell.org.uk/page2.html To be fair his comments showed a heck of a lot of more class than Wills's did, granted he is absolutely pishing himself with laughter and £250k in his hipper but he could have been far less complimentary (he likely will be in future when asked about it) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bresail Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 "if dr wills is correct that the people who lodged the complaint against him did not have permission to spend 3k on legal advice then they should each pay it back. as two of them are solicitors why could they not write it themselves." It would not look good if the above were to put in a solicitors fee invoice in their own names to the council. Too many questions would have to be asked.It has been known in another country, in a different time, for a solicitor to be hired and that solicitor then hires another person or persons, to research the case. These researchers are then paid a fee for their help.These researchers do not show up on the invoice.(Carr v Bunkle.)Regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unlinkedstudent Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 ^^ Are they both still listed members of the Law Society of Scotland? They couldn't give the legal advice as there would be a conflict of interest I reckon. In addition, Solicitors tend to specialise these days - Conveyancing Solicitors wouldn't, for example, deal with Employment Law matters. I'm also unsure if a Solicitor no longer practising could instruct a Counsel/Barrister in order to obtain a written Opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.