Longdog Posted July 15, 2010 Report Share Posted July 15, 2010 ^^Perhaps there should be. I thought there was? Certainly 'sooth' there was... They were public enemy no.1 for some time, so the kids wore them even more LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pleepsie Posted July 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 15, 2010 There is a topic on this subject. "Should Britain follow France and ban the Burka?" Its about half way down the National & International News page. (*** Mod - Right you are; threads merged. thanks ***) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owre-weel Posted July 15, 2010 Report Share Posted July 15, 2010 I can understand the security issues and this is something that can be addressed by other means, rather than an outright ban. Its a sad day when the goverment starts dictating what we all wear, what next, what we eat? Oh yeh they are already doing that! If they have strong religious beliefs and are wearing the burka by choice, thats fair enough. I smile when I see someone in a burka as I think "Ninga" The only problem is I cant see if they smile back. Perhaps they know what I'm thinking! Mind you I wonder how long it would be before the local constabulary stopped me, if I was walking along da street wearing a balaclava we just my eyes showing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EM Posted July 15, 2010 Report Share Posted July 15, 2010 ... it simply isn't practical to enforce such a law.The enforcement will depend on which of the two types of law is enacted. Either way it will be a hypocritical mess. If the law is specifically against culturally symbolic face-covering then those affected will rightly be indignant at being targeted, while other cultural symbols are permitted. On the other hand, if the law is generally against all public face-covering, the selective non-enforcement against people wearing fancy dress etc., will become apparent very quickly. Both approaches fail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibber Posted July 15, 2010 Report Share Posted July 15, 2010 The enforcement will depend on which of the two types of law is enacted. Either way it will be a hypocritical mess. If the law is specifically against culturally symbolic face-covering then those affected will rightly be indignant at being targeted Not if its a Muslim man who is using his culture to pressure his wife or daughter into wearing a rig-out they don't want to wear, he won't be rightly indignant then, just indignant. And his missus and daughter will be very happy and grateful that the law exists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EM Posted July 15, 2010 Report Share Posted July 15, 2010 @GibberJust curious, how would you feel if Orthodox Jews were banned from wearing their archaic garb? Your objection to the domestic pressuring in the Muslim case would surely apply to all such religions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibber Posted July 15, 2010 Report Share Posted July 15, 2010 If people are being pressured to wear clothing because of religion, culture or gender differences that they don't want to then they should be protected, why would I want that legal protection denied to Jews? I don't think there are many orthodox Jews in Britain who are under such pressure to dress in such an extreme manner because of cultural demands and want to be out of that situation but feel that they cannot extricate themselves from it without consequence. There is however a significant number of Muslim women who don't want to walk around covered from head to foot in Britain but are made to, just like there are a significant number who do want to dress that way as a matter of cultural or religious identity. This law is good for the former and bad for the latter, that doesn't make it an entirely bad law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pleepsie Posted July 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2010 @GibberJust curious, how would you feel if Orthodox Jews were banned from wearing their archaic garb? Your objection to the domestic pressuring in the Muslim case would surely apply to all such religions. France's lower house of Parliament voted to ban the wearing of veils that cover the face in public places. People are still free to wear whatever they want as long as thier face is uncovered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shoogler Posted July 16, 2010 Report Share Posted July 16, 2010 There is currently a Poll on this question on AOL online. I was pretty appalled to see the results to date are Yes 89% No 11%. That says a lot about the UK populations attitude or confirms the profile of your average AOL user - take your pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skunnered Posted July 16, 2010 Report Share Posted July 16, 2010 Perhaps most people don't give much thought to the implications of enforcing such a law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lerwick Posted July 18, 2010 Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 We should start by banning those wigs worn by our countrys legal profession. We must be the laughing stock of the world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinner72 Posted July 18, 2010 Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 There is however a significant number of Muslim women who don't want to walk around covered from head to foot in Britain but are made to, just like there are a significant number who do want to dress that way as a matter of cultural or religious identity. This law is good for the former and bad for the latter, that doesn't make it an entirely bad law. This is true, however as it is at the moment, in law, they have the choice. Passing such a law removes that choice and for that reason it is simply wrong. The idiotic part is that it is directed at a specific face covering. If a law were to be tabled that banned the covering of the face of anyone, by anything, in public, that would be more resonable and remove the stigma of religious predjudice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibber Posted July 19, 2010 Report Share Posted July 19, 2010 The issue of whether its desireable to have people go about their daily business with their faces covered isn't addressed if choice is regarded as the most important factor in deciding if the law is right or wrong. The decency laws restrict the choice to walk around the streets in the buff, does that make them bad laws? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest partan Posted July 31, 2010 Report Share Posted July 31, 2010 i really imna dat carin onyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marooned in Maywick Posted July 31, 2010 Report Share Posted July 31, 2010 Crikey - just gone 8pm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.