redrobbie Posted March 18, 2020 Report Share Posted March 18, 2020 (edited) Great timing for his case the press are in such an utter feeding frenzy about this virus to bother much with the Alex Salmod trial . Edited March 18, 2020 by redrobbie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claadehol Posted March 23, 2020 Report Share Posted March 23, 2020 We have to accept the jury's verdict of course but wouldn't it be great if we could all afford this level of legal representation. Nine witnesses and all lying it seems. Serious questions now to be raised re the integrity if the first minister and the SNP government. This is just the beginning but the catastrophic problems facing the UK as a whole with the epidemic must take precedence here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frances144 Posted March 23, 2020 Report Share Posted March 23, 2020 Elon Musk all over again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urabug Posted March 23, 2020 Report Share Posted March 23, 2020 Watch some of those women now forfeit their anonymity to make a bob or two ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George. Posted March 23, 2020 Report Share Posted March 23, 2020 Serious questions now to be raised re the integrity if the first minister and the SNP government. This is just the beginning but the catastrophic problems facing the UK as a whole with the epidemic must take precedence here. Why? Remember, Boris is your P.M. and never forget the statements that he comes out with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostrider Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 Where in the UK could one have sourced a truly unbiased jury to try the Nats saviour and demigod. The verdict as delivered was pretty much a foregone conclusion before he was even charged. Acid 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George. Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 I would suggest that the verdict was a great surprise to those that inflicted the charges upon him, and inflicted the charges upon him for a reason. Westminster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 Not saying he was guilty or innocent, but the prosecution witnesses must have failed to convince the jury. Must have had the same lawyer as O J Simpson !! Why were 2 of the jury discharged ? Is it possible that those 2 might have swayed the verdict in the opposite direction? Acid 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George. Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 Perhaps they weren't Westminstorean enough? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George. Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 Alex Salmond cleared of all 13 charges in sexual assault case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windwalker Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 Perhaps they weren't Westminstorean Perhaps they weren't Westminstorean enough? George, as usual you seem to think that every issue is the blame of Westminster. This was a Scottish man tried in a Scottish court in Edinburgh. What does Westminster have to do with it? Acid 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George. Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 ^Why was Salmond put through court for something he has been found not guilty of? A third party caused that, who do you think that was? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windwalker Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 I would think the 3rd party was the large number of people who brought the complaint against him, still don’t understand why you think this is Westminster’s fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George. Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 I would suggest that Westminster saw it as an opportunity to begin destruction of the S.N.P. but the royalists will possibly disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windwalker Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 Not sure how you’ve come to that conclusion George. Alex Salmond was taken to court, a Scottish court, due to complaints made to the police by a number of women. The court rightly or wrongly found him not guilty. Your conspiracy theory that it was an attempt by Westminster to destroy the SNP Just doesn’t make sense. Being a royalist has nothing to do with it either. Acid 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now